RE: [ebcore] Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebcore] Re: Please raise any objections to closing the ebXML-BP TC now

[Dale Moberg <dmoberg@axway.com>]

HI

 

I think the email archives of both ebCore and ebBP indicate that ebCore is the place where maintenance of ebBP  is intended to occur. That is why the list of issues (enhancements and/or errata fixes) was transferred!

 

But if a refresher statement is needed, I hereby formally (or informally, if you prefer) indicate that ebCore will be the group to address any requests for corrections or enhancements to ebBP, and that the participants in that future effort  (should it come into existence) are expected to  work in accordance with OASIS processes at that time when a need for enhancements or errata is recognized by the members of ebCore.

 

Input from ISO TC 154 would, in my opinion, be precisely the kind of input that would lead ebCore to meet and consider what actions it deems appropriate.

 

Any members from ebCore (now putting on my ebCore co-chair hat) who wish to discuss these issues should indicate on the list, their desire to convene, and I will then schedule a session where we can discuss any concerns.

 

Thanks, Jamie,  for your formulation of your concern. I hope and trust that the above statements address that concern!

 

Dale Moberg

 

 

 

 

From: ebcore@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ebcore@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Clark
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:57 PM
To: Pim van der Eijk; Dale Moberg
Cc: ebcore@lists.oasis-open.org; ebXML BP Mailing list; Chet Ensign
Subject: [ebcore] Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebcore] Re: Please raise any objections to closing the ebXML-BP TC now

 

    My only open concern is that I am hoping to hear, at least informally, acknowledgement from Dale that the ebBP TC designated the ebCore TC to do further maintenance.  Under our rules, I believe that would permit ebCore to respond, if future input from the ISO TC 154 review (or anywhere else) raises questions of possible errata or revisions. 

    Kind regards  Jamie

James Bryce Clark, General Counsel
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php

 

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014, Pim van der Eijk <pvde@sonnenglanz.net> wrote:

 

We should indeed close ebBP.   Right now the ebBP roster has 31 users but only one registered voting member (Dale),   so perhaps a vote is not necessary and Dale can just inform Chet that he wants the TC to close and designate ebCore as maintenance TC.   For CPA TC Admin did not ask for a vote,  but just closed it.  The ebCore was set up for maintenance and related new work.  While ebCore has not met recently,  there still is some interesting unfinished work that hopefully one day some of us finally find the time to work on ..

Pim

On 01/30/2014, Jamie Clark wrote:

Has the ebXML-BP TC acted to designate the ebXML Core TC as its maintenance TC?  As our rules allow?   I think it may have done so ... but if not, it should consider holding that vote before closing, so as to make the IPR rights of the "core" TC to conduct future maintenance more certain.

 * * *