Re: [ebsoa] Process-Oriented Architectures (POA)

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Hmmm...I think I missed a direct answer to my question in all of this.
;)

Joe

David RR Webber wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I just telegraphed the British Embassy and Prince Charles
> is going to have a word with his mother for us.
> 
> Nice to have this hot line.  Clearly will greatly help us
> fend off imposters and claimants trying to usurp our
> position as the authorities on ebSOA.
> 
> You may also want to check out JJs article
> at http://www.ebXMLforum.com  where he diagrams same.
> 
> Cheers, DW.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
> Cc: "ebSOA" <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Monica J. Martin"
> <monica.martin@sun.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Process-Oriented Architectures (POA)
> 
> > David RR Webber wrote:
> > >
> > > Joe,
> > >
> > > I humbly submit this is a redherring.
> > >
> > > Service Oriented IMHO already implies Process by extension  - since
> > > behind the delivery of any service there must be a process
> > > controlling and facilitating it.   Tha'ts why BPSS and BPEL are part
> > > of the SOA stack.
> >
> > Thanks David - but according to whom are they part of the SOA stack?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > > We need another acronym like a hole in the head - let's leave that
> > > stuff to the professionals at Gartner to dream up, eh?  ; -)
> > >
> > > Cheers, DW.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> > > To: "ebSOA" <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > > Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:30 AM
> > > Subject: [ebsoa] Process-Oriented Architectures (POA)
> > >
> > > > I know that our concentration is to be service-oriented architectures,
> > > > but at the same time I'm thinking about what will lie beyond (so that
> we
> > > > can best prepare). A term popped into my head on the way home
> yesterday
> > > > (the DC Beltway apparatentely inspires me): Process-Oriented
> > > > Architecture, or "POA".
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone heard this term used before? I Google'd it and found few
> > > > hits, all of which seemed to be individual (rather than corporate)
> > > > references.
> > > >
> > > > As you can tell from the term, just as SOAs enable (involve, pick your
> > > > favorite word here) the use of shared services, POAs will extend SOAs
> to
> > > > enable the use of shared Web Services-based processes that are based
> on
> > > > shared Web Services that are defined within SOAs, working in concert
> > > > with each other. So for a US federal application (my primary client),
> > > > this could mean a set of shared Web Services-based business processes
> > > > for federal agencies, in a flexible, agile, process environment.
> > > >
> > > > Does this concept resound with anyone?
> > > > --
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > Joseph Chiusano
> > > > Associate
> > > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Kind Regards,
> > Joseph Chiusano
> > Associate
> > Booz | Allen | Hamilton
> >

-- 
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton