[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebsoa] [Fwd: Crashes Deserve a Closer Look]
Yes, and let's not forget the run-time aspects, beyond the tools: <Quote> In the realm of software, the move to a service-based architecture offers developers a more granular opportunity to vote for their own preferred trade-off between doing more and failing less. Improved tools are emerging for developers. </Quote> For run-time assurance beyond this, we need standards such as the soon-to-be-released-for-OASIS-review-and-vote Web Services Reliable Messaging (WSRM). Kind Regards, Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info] > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:26 AM > To: ebSOA OASIS TC > Subject: [ebsoa] [Fwd: Crashes Deserve a Closer Look] > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1651826,00.asp > > I like Peter Coffees' points here. Clearly having reliable > infrastructure is critical. > > This need is more clearly serviced in CPA / BPSS rather than > WSDL - with the time-to-perform metrics. > > DW >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]