[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Groups - Provisional Charter (Draft) (NEW-Charter-v0dot1_DRAFT.doc) uploaded
Duane, Good comments - seems to me then that another option here is to create a SC of the TC to specifically attack this whole topic of an SOA reference model - that's a lot less disruptive to the process - allows you to quickly and easily create a charter for the SC to do that, and allows us to retain the whole team. Meanwhile - I'm thinking the BPSS team especially - once BPSS V2 is complete here (we're very close on that) - can certainly pick up part of the work on clarifying ebSOA V1 around that.... That will certainly get us thru the next 6 months handly - and then if at that point there's more bi-furcation needed - we can assess then. Seems like we're in danger of creating a ton of needless bureacratic overhead for ourselves - with minimal advantage. SC rock in OASIS for doing fast trail-blazing - which is what I'm sensing you want to do! Cheers, DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> Cc: <ebsoa@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Groups - Provisional Charter (Draft) (NEW-Charter-v0dot1_DRAFT.doc) uploaded > > > David RR Webber wrote: > > ><SNIP> > > > >Fourth - if you really really really want to go off and pursue the ocean of > >SOA - I would > >respectfully suggest that is a new TC effort entirely - and one which you > >are obviously > >free to start in addition to the ebSOA TC as the OASIS process allows. > > > > > DN - This is one of the options we discussed and are fine with. > > >However - I believe the constituency here wishes to complete the work on > >ebSOA first > >before launching out into another ocean. > > > > > DN - the constituency that was present at the last 6 meetings agrees > that if ebXML and web services are SOA, it makes sense to define what > SOA is (as a reference model) before we go about specializing it. The > W3C Web Services Architecture group also came to a similar conclusion > (my interpretation - maybe not shared). > > The work to define an SOA reference model (not an architecture) that > adheres to the design principles of ws*, eb* among others, is a work > item that should be examined in detail. > > Duane > > -- > *********** > Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com > Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ > Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa > *********** > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]