[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public Comment
Comment from: support@liquid-technologies.com Name: Simon Sprott Title: Technical Director Organization: Liquid Technologies Regarding Specification: ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd We have been testing your new schemas for compliance with our XML Data Binding tool Liquid XML 2005. However the schema ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd, is invalid - it contains an unknown element ProcessSpecificationReferenceType. With this removed both the signal and ebbp-2.0.1.xsd schemas can have classes generated from the correctly, however your sample XML files are also invalid - ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExamplePIP7c7For1.01-en.xml ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExampleTransformFor1.01-en.xml each containing a number of problems, that prevent them from validating against the schema. If you fix these problems, we would be happy to re-test your schemas, and validate the generated class libraries against any sample xml documents you may have. We also believe that our tool Liquid XML, would be of use to many of your members, especially anyone manipulating XML fro C++, .Net, Java or COM. Once these small issues have been resolved, and we have successfully re-tested your schemas/samples would it be possible to send a information about the product out with the next release note? http://www.liquid-technologies.com Regards Simon Sprott Reference: <xsd:complexType name="SignalIdentificationInformation"> ... <xsd:sequence> ... <xsd:element name="ProcessSpecificationInfo" type="bpssignal:ProcessSpecificationReferenceType" minOccurs="0"/> ... </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]