Re: [ebxml-bp] [12/12/03]: BPSS Signals

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Martin,

This is in-line with what I was suggesting.

Maybe the answer is to to treat an affirmative 
message reciept as a superset - and implied
ackrep once you get it - that implies go to
BPSS "next step" regardless.  

So if you are able to proceed to the next 
step in the process - do it right away - and 
if the partner gets that ahead of confirmation 
messages - then will simply move on and 
ignore requirements for intermediary 
ping-pong acks.

You can simply then have a flag at the 
top of the BPSS for 'treat-msg-as-inclusive-ack'
"True / False".  So if someone really does want
stepwise ACK processing they can still have it
too.

Thanks, DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <martin.me.roberts@bt.com>
To: <david@drrw.info>; <serm@nist.gov>; <ebxml-bp@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 4:24 AM
Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] [12/12/03]: BPSS Signals


Dear all,

Happy new year.