Re: [ebxml-bp] 1/27/2004: BPSS Signals (Work Item 59)

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> Nickull: Are we addressing the tie in between the CPA value of 
> "mustPersist" and the business audit trail requirements that a 
> Business Process execution engine may have to keep that information in 
> a persistent store (or access it from another persistent storage 
> container) for a certian period of time?  It seems to me that these 
> items may have to be recallable for certain industries.  In Justice, a 
> judge who signs a wiretap order may have to be able to say he did so 
> by seeing a certain document (exactly as is) on a previous date.

mm1: The discussion started with optimizations being investigated by 
some user community use cases (sending of signal with a response). The 
discussion on non-repudiation was an outgrowth of that discussion.

A few original posts began:
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200312/msg00040.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200401/msg00001.html
I'll let you negotiate the rest.