[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] State Alignment and Web Services
Monica, I believe this came out of a scenario that Anders described - where he want to Ack the RFQ - but not confirm it until downstream suppliers had responded. Therefore 'pending' was offered as an additional status. Anders also wanted to make sure that the signal was *not* a legally binding response - hence 'pending' again avoids that connotation. It all made sense to me at the time - and I included this in the XML example I posted on signals - along with the additional two attributes - (BTW - signalType - agree that is not needed - and can be deferred to V3). Thanks, DW > > > mm1: David, I do not recall that we defin3ed a pending status in the > special sessions. Dale, can you confirm please. Thanks. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]