[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSI and BSI andmove on
Sacha: No that is not what I said nor is it what I wrote. The messaging may contrain certain aspects of the business process at runtime. They should be capable of working together. For the record, I informed members of the BPSS team 2-3 years ago (Monica Martin and Dave Welsh) that using BSI as a term within BPSS was probably a very bad idea that would lead to confusion. Duane Sacha Schlegel wrote: >Hi Duane, > >Good to see you :) > >So you say: > >"Abstract = BSI" >"Concrete = MS, CPA and BPSS" > >no concrete BSI? ;) > >So you say a MS takes care of the BPSS? > >Sacha > >Am Freitag, den 04.02.2005, 12:21 -0800 schrieb Duane Nickull: > > >>Monica J. Martin wrote: >> >> >> >>>mm1: David, I would suggest we have some clear boundaries before >>>engaging ebSOA team. Some of the discussion surrounds assumptions >>>about the role of the MSI or BSI should be clarified by the >>>experienced parties and experts involved from ebBP and ebMS teams (not >>>to say there are not experts in ebSOA). Thanks. >>> >>> >>Monica: >> >>Those groups are where a lot of FUD comes from surrounding the BSI. >>Some people actually stated they believed the BSI was concrete and hence >>not an abstract artifact. >> >>Abstract = BSI >>Concrete = MS, CPA and BPSS >> >>Duane >> >> >> > > > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]