[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ebBP 3/27/2005: Comment re: NOF Handoff (wd 10-schema 2/22)
Several emails were sent discussing backend processes. As we anticipate more changes will be required than advised in v2.0, I've proposed this change in addition to the others we have made thus far. Proposed change: Section 4.6.6.3 Change from: Criteria surrounding the use of the business transaction patterns may include reliable messaging and use of the isGuaranteedMessageDelivery requirement (See Section 4.6.6.1). In preceding technical specification versions, the guiding principles used were incomplete in describing the scope and operational details related to state synchronization. Change to: Criteria surrounding the use of the business transaction patterns may include reliable messaging and use of the isGuaranteedMessageDelivery requirement (See Section 4.6.6.1). Any agreement between trading partners could specify that the certificate-based digest used by a message protocol could be captured and stored as the non-repudiation digest (making the message receipt function as a business protocol receipt). By default the Receipt Acknowledgement (and its associated on-repudiation attributes) are separate from the reliable messaging layer. In preceding technical specification versions, the guiding principles used were incomplete in describing the scope and operational details related to state synchronization.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]