Re: [Fwd: Re: [ebxml-bp] ebBP 5/23/2005: Comment re: Response Only(wd-2-0-1-01)]

[Monica J Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> mm2: Two additions from Sally St. Amand. Thanks to Sally.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [ebxml-bp] ebBP 5/23/2005: Comment re: Response Only (wd-2-0-1-01)
> From:
> "Sally St. Amand" <sallystamand@yahoo.com>
> Date:
> Tue, 24 May 2005 06:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
> Monica J Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
>
>
> Monica
> I had planned to bring these comments (see high lights below) up on 
> the call, but if I make it I will be in listening mode not able to 
> reference these docs. Use them as you see fit.
> Sally*/
> /*
>
>     mm1: ...Add (after bulleted list of patterns):
>     .....
>     * If the Request may or may not be used, the Data Exchange pattern
>     could be used as the parties may bound the scope of how the
>     pattern is used. ! [Add] When flexibility more than predictability
>     is needed the Data Exchange  specialization of a Business
>     Transaction is the likely appropriate definition......
>
mm1: Sally, given discussion 24 May 2005, I think this addition is still 
appropriate.

>     Glossary: ....Pattern
>
>
>
>     A pattern specifies the type of the message exchange (request,
>     response
>     and signals) that applies for a given Business Transaction
>     definition.
>     _It is a way to define classes of Business Transaction definitions_
>
>     [Replace with] It is a way to provide predictability when defining
>     classes of Business Transaction definitions.
>
mm1: Same as above.