[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: About the final CPA problem?
Hello, Martin.
I am Antonio from Taiwan.
Do you still remember me ?
I have some problems about the "final CPA."
Could you help me to solve this?
Sorry...my English is not good ,but I try to explain the
problems.
The problem is :
If "First Party - A" and "Second
Party- B " want to negotiate their CPPs and want to generate the
common CPA.
And If we have CPP-A , NDD-A and CPP-B
,NDD-B (4 documents).
Step1:I assume
the 4 documents' structure is below:
CPP-A's elements are "A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H"
NDD-A's
elements are "A,B,C,D"
CPP-B's elements are "A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H"
NDD-B's elements are "A,B,C,D,E,F"
So
the NDD Template (the
intersection of NDD-A and NDD-B) will be like "A,B,C,D"
The
NDD Template's values of elements( "A,B,C,D") are
different.
Step2:If they generate the CPA Template from CPP-A and
CPP-B.
The CPA Template will be the "combination" from CPP-A and CPP-B.
The structure of CPA Template is below:
<CollaborationProtocolAgreement>
<Status>
.........
<PartyInfo>CPP-A </PartyInfo>
<A> 1 </A>
<B> 2 </B>
<C> 3 </C>
<D> 4 </D>
<E> 5 </E>
<F> 6 </F>
<G> 7 </G>
<H> 8 </H>
<PartyInfo>CPP-B</PartyInfo>
<A> 10 </A>
<B> 11 </B>
<C> 12 </C>
<D> 13 </D>
<E> 14 </E>
<F> 15 </F>
<G> 16 </G>
<H> 17 </H> <Comment>........
</CollaborationProtocolAgreement>
Step3:If
they use the method of negotiation message to negotiate the NDD
Template.
After negotiating,finally they
both accept the values("A,B,C,D") of NDD Template.
Therefore,The
NDD Template's values of elements( "A,B,C,D") could be the same or different.
----------------- Right ot
Wrong???
And we will make the NDD Template's
values to return to the CPA Template's
value.
In another word, the CPA Template's value will be replaced with
the NDD Template's values. -----------------
Right ot
Wrong???
If it is Right.
And
I won't know what is the final CPA's
structure.------------------??
The below(maybe1 & maybe2) is my
guess:
Maybe 1:The elements(E,F,G,H) are
disappear.
I
feel a little strange for situation.
<CollaborationProtocolAgreement>
<Status>
.........
<PartyInfo>CPP-A </PartyInfo>
<A> 10 </A>
<B> 2 </B>
<C> 3 </C>
<D> 20 </D>
<PartyInfo>CPP-B</PartyInfo>
<A> 10 </A>
<B> 2 </B>
<C> 12 </C>
<D> 13 </D>
<Comment> ........
</CollaborationProtocolAgreement>
Maybe 2:The
elements(E,F,G,H) are still existence. but why...................??
<CollaborationProtocolAgreement>
<Status>
.........
<PartyInfo>CPP-A </PartyInfo>
<A> 10 </A>
<B> 2 </B>
<C> 3 </C>
<D> 20 </D>
<E> 5 </E>
<F> 6 </F>
<G> 7 </G>
<H> 8 </H>
<PartyInfo>CPP-B</PartyInfo>
<A> 10 </A>
<B> 2 </B>
<C> 12 </C>
<D> 13 </D>
<E> 14 </E>
<F> 15 </F>
<G> 16 </G>
<H> 17 </H> <Comment>........
</CollaborationProtocolAgreement> Best Regards,
Antonio
P.S.
I am studying the "ebXML
Automated Negotiation of Collaboration Protocol
Agreements"
And I am building the ACNP system (Automated
Collaboration and Negotiation Platform).
------------------------------------------------------------------- 徐瑞谷 (Antonio Hsu) 中原大學 資訊管理研究所 Institute of Information Management, CYCU TEL:886-(0)3-2655418 Cell Phone:0937537955 Email:antony65@mis.cycu.edu.tw -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]