OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-cppa-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Fwd: [ebxml-cppa] Fw: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive under sameServiceBinding


Forwarding reply from Hima:

>X-XWall-Bayes: 16
>From: "Himagiri.Mukkamala@sybase.com" <Himagiri.Mukkamala@sybase.com>
>To: "ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org" <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Fw: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive 
>under sameServiceBinding
>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:08:48 -0700
>X-Assembled-By: XWall v3.28
>X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2004 14:09:06.0860 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[15BAE6C0:01C405E0]
>
>
>
>
>
>Mail to comment list bounces.
>Can someone post it to that list.
>
>thanks
>hima
>----- Forwarded by Himagiri Mukkamala/SYBASE on 03/09/2004 06:06 AM -----
>
>              Himagiri
>              Mukkamala/SYBASE
>                                                                         To
>              03/09/2004 06:03          "Larchier Christophe"
>              AM                        <clarchier@axway.com>
>                                                                         cc
>                                        ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open
>                                        .org
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        Re: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple
>                                        CanSend/CanReceive under same
>                                        ServiceBinding(Document link:
>                                        Himagiri Mukkamala)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From section 8.4.12 of cppa specification
>
><quote>
>Under a given ServiceBinding element, there MAY be multiple CanSend or
>CanReceive child elements with the same action to allow different software
>  entry points and Transport options. In such a scenario, the
>DeliveryChannels
>referred by the ChannelID child elements of ThisPartyActionBinding SHALL
>point to distinct EndPoints for the receiving MSH to uniquely identify the
>  DeliveryChannel being used for this particular message exchange.
>NOTE: An implementation MAY provide the capability of dynamically assigning
>delivery channels on a per Message basis during performance of the
>BinaryCollaboration.
>The delivery channel selected would be chosen, based on present conditions,
>  from those identified by CanSend elements that refer to the
>BinaryCollaboration
>  that is sending the Message. On the receiving side, the MSH can use the
>distinct
>EndPoints to identify the DeliveryChannel used for this message exchange.
><quote>
>
>The criteria is based on how the API layer above messaging exposes the msh
>functionality.
>One of the parameters could be the protocol type along with action name and
>other parameters, based on which the right channel and transport will be
>chosen.
>
>-HTH
>hima
>
>
>
>              "Larchier
>              Christophe"
>              <clarchier@axway.                                          To
>              com>                      <ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-ope
>                                        n.org>
>              03/09/2004 12:47                                           cc
>              AM
>                                                                    Subject
>                                        [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple
>                                        CanSend/CanReceive under same
>                                        ServiceBinding
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>
>In a CPA file, when there is multiple CanSend or CanReceive child elements
>with the same action under the same ServiceBinding element (for example,
>one for synchronous communication and one for asynchronous communication),
>how is choosen the good one?
>
>
>Is the criteria, the order in the CPA file?
>
>
>Thanks for your help,
>Christophe
>
>
>
>
>
>______________________________________
>
>
>Christophe Larchier
>Axway.
>a Sopra Group company.
>
>
>3, rue de Pré Faucon
>PAE - Les Glaisins - BP238
>F-74942 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex
>( +33 (0)4 50 33 31 55
>______________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
>the OASIS TC), go to 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-cppa/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>

*************************************
Martin Sachs
standards architect
Cyclone Commerce
msachs@cyclonecommerce.com 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]