[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: [ebxml-cppa] Fw: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive under sameServiceBinding
Forwarding reply from Hima: >X-XWall-Bayes: 16 >From: "Himagiri.Mukkamala@sybase.com" <Himagiri.Mukkamala@sybase.com> >To: "ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org" <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org> >Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Fw: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive >under sameServiceBinding >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 07:08:48 -0700 >X-Assembled-By: XWall v3.28 >X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003 >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2004 14:09:06.0860 (UTC) >FILETIME=[15BAE6C0:01C405E0] > > > > > >Mail to comment list bounces. >Can someone post it to that list. > >thanks >hima >----- Forwarded by Himagiri Mukkamala/SYBASE on 03/09/2004 06:06 AM ----- > > Himagiri > Mukkamala/SYBASE > To > 03/09/2004 06:03 "Larchier Christophe" > AM <clarchier@axway.com> > cc > ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open > .org > Subject > Re: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple > CanSend/CanReceive under same > ServiceBinding(Document link: > Himagiri Mukkamala) > > > > > > > > > > From section 8.4.12 of cppa specification > ><quote> >Under a given ServiceBinding element, there MAY be multiple CanSend or >CanReceive child elements with the same action to allow different software > entry points and Transport options. In such a scenario, the >DeliveryChannels >referred by the ChannelID child elements of ThisPartyActionBinding SHALL >point to distinct EndPoints for the receiving MSH to uniquely identify the > DeliveryChannel being used for this particular message exchange. >NOTE: An implementation MAY provide the capability of dynamically assigning >delivery channels on a per Message basis during performance of the >BinaryCollaboration. >The delivery channel selected would be chosen, based on present conditions, > from those identified by CanSend elements that refer to the >BinaryCollaboration > that is sending the Message. On the receiving side, the MSH can use the >distinct >EndPoints to identify the DeliveryChannel used for this message exchange. ><quote> > >The criteria is based on how the API layer above messaging exposes the msh >functionality. >One of the parameters could be the protocol type along with action name and >other parameters, based on which the right channel and transport will be >chosen. > >-HTH >hima > > > > "Larchier > Christophe" > <clarchier@axway. To > com> <ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-ope > n.org> > 03/09/2004 12:47 cc > AM > Subject > [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple > CanSend/CanReceive under same > ServiceBinding > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > >In a CPA file, when there is multiple CanSend or CanReceive child elements >with the same action under the same ServiceBinding element (for example, >one for synchronous communication and one for asynchronous communication), >how is choosen the good one? > > >Is the criteria, the order in the CPA file? > > >Thanks for your help, >Christophe > > > > > >______________________________________ > > >Christophe Larchier >Axway. >a Sopra Group company. > > >3, rue de Pré Faucon >PAE - Les Glaisins - BP238 >F-74942 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex >( +33 (0)4 50 33 31 55 >______________________________________ > > > > > > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-cppa/members/leave_workgroup.php. > ************************************* Martin Sachs standards architect Cyclone Commerce msachs@cyclonecommerce.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]