RE: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive under same ServiceBinding

["Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Title: Message

I think the first point is that the presence of multiple delivery channels for a given action in a CPA is not a typical situation.

The second point would be that when there are multiple channels agreed upon, they provide "fallbacks" and their order of

occurence is by convention the order in which they are tried.

 

[Apologize if this was sent previously, I found it in my unsent messages which I am trying to finish before the holiday...]

-----Original Message-----
From: Larchier Christophe [mailto:clarchier@axway.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 1:47 AM
To: ebxml-cppa-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ebxml-cppa-comment] Multiple CanSend/CanReceive under same ServiceBinding
Importance: Low

Hi all,

In a CPA file, when there is multiple CanSend or CanReceive child elements with the same action under the same ServiceBinding element (for example, one for synchronous communication and one for asynchronous communication), how is choosen the good one?

Is the criteria, the order in the CPA file?

Thanks for your help,
Christophe

______________________________________

Christophe Larchier
Axway.
a Sopra Group company.

3, rue de Pré Faucon
PAE - Les Glaisins - BP238
F-74942 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex
( +33 (0)4 50 33 31 55
______________________________________