[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Re: [ebxml-dev] CPA Formation
Regine, There is a lot of information in Appendix E of the CPPA specification. At this time, there are no mapping rules of the sort that I believe you are interested in. There are some things that I believe are generally understood, such as the one you mentioned "both partners have to support the same transmission protocol". This and other similar matters are mentioned in Appendix E. I don't believe that what is defined at the business process level will help you since everything at the ebxml business process level is defined in terms of roles. The connection to "implementation" is performed by the CPA. Work is beginning in the ebXML interoperability team on the creation of profiles that I expect will contain the kind of mapping information that you are looking for. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* "Schilling, Regine" To: "'ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org'" <ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org> <Regine.Schilling@ cc: iao.fhg.de> Subject: [ebxml-dev] CPA Formation 09/12/2002 04:35 AM Hi, can anybody help me? I'm trying to programm an automated "negotiation tool" and at the moment I compare 2 CPPs in order to create a CPA. The problem is, that for me it is inexplicit, where certain rules have to be deposed to create a generic tool which can deal with any possible business processes and the appendant actions (e. g. PIP3A4 from Rosettanet with the dependant action bindings). Is it necessary to have a storage or something for each possible business process ? Or in other words: Is there a repository / another XML-specifications for something like mapping rules? E.g. <Buyer> has to correspond with the role <seller> however both partners have to support the same transmission protocol. Where can I derive this information from? Thanks in advance Regine Schilling Regine Schilling Fraunhofer IAO Nobelstrasse 12 70569 Stuttgart Germany Tel.: +49 7 11/9 70-51 50 Fax.: +49 7 11/9 70-51 11 E-Mail: Regine.Schilling@iao.fhg.de http://www.iao.fhg.de ---------------------------------------------------------------- The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS. To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC