[ebxml-cppa-negot] Re: [ebxml-msg] Short proposal

[Monica Martin - Sun Microsystems - Burlington United States<Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

I thought it best to allow the cppa-negot team to have some visibility to this question.

Thanks.

>Monica,
>
>The default default CPA Matt introduced to provide an environment for 
>the proposed Interrogation Service would (should?) provide parameters 
>for a CPA negotiation exchange.  I am not particularly familiar with 
>exactly what's happening in the CPP/A subteam but wonder whether the 
>Interrogation Service addresses a slice of the requirements the 
>negotiation team may meet when that effort is complete.  The real 
>question: What short cuts through a negotiation process (such as 
>retrieving a CPA your partner is dictating) will be necessary and are 
>these requirements already met by the CPP/A subteam output?  This could 
>be phrased going the other way: Is a full negotiation process such as 
>the CPP/A subteam is discussing really necessary and does the 
>Interrogation Service meet the true requirements?
>
>Matt?
>
>thanx,
>    doug
>
>On 20-02-2003 15:52, Monica Martin - Sun Microsystems - Burlington 
>United States wrote:
>
>>Matt and Doug,
>>Forgive me for lurking...but how, if at all, does this affect some of the
>assumptions being made by the cppa-negotiation team,
>>where they may start with a virtual type CPA template to negotiate the salient
>requirements for a final CPA?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>Monica
>>  
>>
>...
>
>