[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [cppa negot] 9/1/2003 [Fwd: [legalxml-econtracts] Automated ContractNegotiations
What is interesting about both of these automated negotiation inputs: * Concentrates on business agreements, which may guide, restrict, levy requirements on the technical infrastructure to meet those commitments. * Looks at the presentation of the contracts, specifically using tools (although they should be product/tool independent). Should we make that comment back to that team? * Seeks to place important controls on the negotiation: document integrity, risk management, query, etc. The key is how does it affect us in how we think about CPA negotiation, as it may interact with/receive requirements from the business negotiation (contracts or otherwise). I am seeing more and more that the LegalXML relates to / may overlap with CEFACT UBAC. Thoughts anyone? Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]