[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: TPA reference element?
What might happen in a real business scenario if BPSS has IsLegallyBinding turned ON, CPA explicitly says there's no legal contract to be used, and something major goes wrong where as a result one of the 2 parties wants to take legal recourse. BPSS over-rides CPA ? -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:43 AM > To: Dale Moberg > Cc: ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: TPA reference element? > > > > We already have such an element although it is "hidden" :-) > In the early > versions of what became tpaML, we (IBM Res.) had a LegalText > element. The > spec stated that this could be used to record the ID of an > accompanying > paper contract. When people inside IBM started advising us > not to tangle > with the legal profession, we changed the element name to > Comment and that > has persisted into CPP-CPA V 1.0. > > Since we have more recently seen that the legal community is in fact > interested and friendly to us, I agree that we could add an element > specifically for identifying an accompanying contract. > Presumably, this > element would be CPA-only. Since it would be directly under the root > element, we can enforce the restriction to CPA only in the > DTD and Schema. > We probably should use the term "TPA" only as an example of such a > contract. > > Regards, > Marty > > ************************************************************** > *********************** > > Martin W. Sachs > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center > P. O. B. 704 > Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 > 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 > Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM > Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com > ************************************************************** > *********************** > > > > Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com> on 06/26/2001 02:18:36 PM > > To: ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org > cc: > Subject: TPA reference element? > > > > Another issue for next month's kickoff-- > probably under the small additions category-- > is to add an optional element that can reference a TPA > that is to be associated with a CPA. > > Just as we now have pointers off to trading > partner information, and business process specifications, > a pointer to a TPA might also be useful. > Some industry groups, RosettaNet for example, > are exploring specifying TPAs > for their communities in the near future. > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC