[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: PartyID
Himagiri, The correct assumption is that the CPA currently has no support for intermediaries. Support for intermediaries is on the proposed list of work items for the new CPPA team. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Himagiri Mukkamala <himagiri@sybase.com> on 07/26/2001 12:50:34 PM To: ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org cc: Subject: PartyID CPA spec says that there shall be only one PartyId under each PartyInfo in a CPA and says only one partyId will be included under To and From elements in an ebXML Message. From MSH spec, there could be multiple partyIds for supporting intermediaries. So, is the assumption that when using a CPA with MSH, there be only one PartyId irrespective of number of hops. -himagiri ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-cppa-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC