Re: PartyID

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Himagiri,

The correct assumption is that the CPA currently has no support for
intermediaries.  Support for intermediaries is on the proposed list of work
items for the new CPPA team.

Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Himagiri Mukkamala <himagiri@sybase.com> on 07/26/2001 12:50:34 PM

To:   ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:  PartyID



CPA spec says that there shall be only one PartyId under
each PartyInfo in a CPA and says only one partyId
will be included under To and From elements in an ebXML Message.

From MSH spec, there could be multiple partyIds for supporting
intermediaries.

So, is the assumption that when using a CPA with MSH,
there be only one PartyId irrespective of number of hops.

-himagiri


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-cppa-request@lists.oasis-open.org