[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Security - question about nonrepudiation
All, If two parties agree on complimentary roles within a process specification, and agree on the document properties (in particular signing) don't the nonrepudiation elements in the delivery channel characteristics become superfluous? After all, the parties have agreed on a process specification that includes acknowledgement of receipt, and they have agreed on which documents have signatures attached (in the document exchange). To me NRR sounds like a requirement on the BP, and NRO is a document requirement for digital signature. I have heard that the delivery channel is an implementation convenience, which is ok, but it seems even for that the authenticated tag covers the digital signature requirement. And the implementation already is monitoring the runtime process according to the BPSS. Do you think the nonrepudiation tags in the delivery channel express unique requirements that are not already covered? Tim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC