[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Potential 2.0 requirement
The schema of a business document may contain certain optional fields. However, two trading partners may specifically require some of these optional fields be always present in their exhanged messages. Should this be specifiable through the CPP/A? -Arvola
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC