ebxml-cppa message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: FW: OASIS schedule update
- From: Tony Weida <TonyW@EDIFECS.COM>
- To: "CPPA (E-mail)" <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:04:06 -0700
Some of this
information is relevant for our committee too. --
Tony
Hello All,
I spoke with Karl Best this morning
regarding the schedule for submitting specs for an OASIS Membership vote.
What I said yesterday was wrong regarding making a submission at the end of
September.
The Process is as follows: (excerpted from
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.shtml . See the link for the
complete text)
Section 2. Standards Process
...Upon resolution of
the TC to move the specification forward, its chair shall submit the following
items to OASIS:
(a) a formal specification that is a valid member of its
type;
(b) appropriate documentation for the specification;
(c) a clear
English-language summary of the specification;
(d) certification by at least
three OASIS member organizations that they are successfully using the
specification;
(e) an account of or pointer to votes and comments received
in any earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification,
together with the originating TC's response to each comment;
f) a pointer to
the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC; and
(g) a
statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all members of the TC have
been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR policy.
Thirty days shall be
allowed for administrative processing of a proposed standard.
The proposal
shall be submitted to the OASIS membership for review at the beginning of the
first calendar quarter following the 30 days allocated for administrative
review.
At the beginning of the next calendar quarter, the
proposal shall be submitted to the voting members of OASIS, who shall have
thirty days to return a ballot approving or disapproving the proposal.
.....
What does this mean to us?
1. Since we won't have
something ready to submit to Karl by September1 (thirty days before October 1),
we won't have a spec ready for membership review October 1.
2. Our next OASIS
deadline is December 1. If we submit a spec to Karl by December 1, then he
will send it out for review January 1. The ballot for OASIS Membership
vote will then take place April 1.
3. The timeline of number 2 gives
us a nice cushion to get a lot public comments before it goes out for membership
review. According to Karl, the specification that is sent out for review
is the specification that is balloted with no changes allowed in
between.
(Karl: please correct me if I'm
wrong)
--lisa
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC