[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: <1.0 bug> action attribute in section 7.5.8.1
Arvola, But the <name> attribute for RequestingBusinessActivity and RespondingBusinessActivity is implied. In this case does it make sense to use <name> attribute of BusinessTransactionActivity as the name of action. Also <name> of BusinessTransaction is not guaranteed to be unique. Using this as the "action" could pose problems for implementors of BSI -hima Arvola Chan wrote: > The action attribute should not be equated with the name > attribute of the desired BusinessTransaction. There are > two activities within a Business Transaction, a > RequestingBusinessActivity and a RespondingBusinessActivity. > > Depending on the direction of the message, the action > attribute should be set to equal the name of the > RequestingBusinessActivity or the name of the > RespondingBusinessActivity. > > Similarly, in section 7.3.7.4 xlink:href attribute, the link should be > to the corresponding RequestingBusinessActivity, or to the > corresponding RespondingBusinessActivity. > > -Arvola > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC