[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Negotiation item
The following excerpt from the minutes of the CPPA Oct. 18 conference call contains a point that may be related to the negotiation project. See the last few sentences. Regards, Marty Service / Action Hima will be updating the issues list in his document. Dale asked what the service and action values in a SOAP header would be when a message combines an MSH signal and a business action. Arvola replied that according to the MSG spec, the service and action for the business action would be used. Dale then inquired about the case of both a business signal and business response; in that case Arvola indicated the answer is unclear. Arvola noted that BPSS doesn't have the notion of synch reply; Dale thought that was reasonably an implementation decision for the CPA. Arvola thought that synch reply was implicitly overriding some of the timing parameters. Tony responded that timing and synch reply can be considered independently ? regardless of synch reply, all, some, or none of the signals and actions will meet the timing constraints (the fact that some signals and actions may arrive together doesn't change the assessment of whether or not they meet their timing constraints). Parties who agree to use synch reply mode should take that into account when specifying timing parameters. Agreement authoring tools might provide advice accordingly. ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com *************************************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC