[ebxml-cppa] Re: [ebxml-msg] Re: Fw: Namespaces

[Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>]

Chris:

I notice in the latest registry.xsd

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200111/msg00010.html

the following declarations under the schema element:

  targetNamespace = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:registry:xsd:2.0"
  xmlns:tns = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:registry:xsd:2.0"

I suppose that the XSD's we use for MSG and CPP/A should similarly have:

  targetNamespace = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:service:xsd:1.1"
  xmlns:tns = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:service:xsd:1.1"

and

  targetNamespace = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:cppa:xsd:1.1"
  xmlns:tns = "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:cppa:xsd:1.1"

respectively.

I will continue to post the working drafts of the XSD's as

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/draft-msg-header-<NN>.
xsd

and

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/schema/draft-cpp-cpa-<NN>.xs
d

The finalized versions will be posted as:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-1_1.xsd

and

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/schema/cpp-cpa-1_1.xsd

Regards,
-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
To: Nikola Stojanovic <nikola.stojanovic@encodasystems.com>; ebXML Msg
<ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
<ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:03 AM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: Fw: Namespaces


All,

Please see the note from Nikola below. Apparently, OASIS
has got a URN namespace that we can use (woo hoo). We can,
and should (IMO) leverage this in our spec (and possibly
also in the CPP/A specs if appropriate.

We are currently using a uri: scheme for some of our
URIs which (upon further investigation) is inappropriate.
I think that this may be my fault (sheepish grin).

I would therefore like to recommend that we consider replacing
the "uri:www.ebxml.org/messageService" prefixed URIs in our
spec with "urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:service:" as this URN
is a formally registered URN namespace.

Thoughts?

Cheers,

Chris

Nikola Stojanovic wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nikola Stojanovic" <nikola.stojanovic@encodasystems.com>
> To: <regrep-raws@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:07 AM
> Subject: Namespaces
>
>
> One of the outstanding items for this subteam was the resolution on
> namespaces. Here is what I'd like to suggest to the group to consider.
>
> One of the few registered formal URN Namespaces is "A URN Namespace for
> OASIS" (see [1]). It seems that its structure and semantics would be
> sufficient for our work. According to [1] ebXML namespaces would be under
> "names:tc:" hierarchy so they would start with urn:oasis:names:tc: A
unique
> "tc-id" in our case, according to Karl Best, would be ebxml-regrep. Then
the
> rest of it might look like:
>
> urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:registry:xsd:1.1 - this would be a
Registry
> schema
> urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:services:wsdl:1.7 - this would be a
Registry
> Services WSDL
> urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:soapbinding:wsdl:1.8 - this would be a
> Registry Services WSDL SOAP binding
>
>
> [1]
>
http://lists.research.netsol.com/pipermail/urn-nid/2001-January/000120.html
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nikola Stojanovic
> Lead Technologist, Research and Development
> Encoda Systems Inc.
> 101 Pineview Terrace
> Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
> nikola.stojanovic@encodasystems.com
> Tel: 607-273-2224
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>