Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Hima,

I agree.  See the last sentence of my posting that you replied to.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



"Himagiri(Hima) Mukkamala" <himagiri@sybase.com> on 11/21/2001 10:00:40 AM

To:    Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:    Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>,
       ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org, ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:    Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call



Marty,

If two processes use the same BPSS, e.g Intel using same "Order Management"
business process, then service name for conversations between
"Intel & A", "Intel & B" would be the same. As the CPAId
woul be different, routing component can make the right decision.

-hima

Martin W Sachs wrote:

> Dale,
>
> It isn't clear to me from previous discussions that when more than one
> application behind the same MSH uses the same BPSS instance document, the
> different "BPSS instances" will have unique service names.  Do they all
> have the same UUID or unique UUIDs in this case?
> If the service names are the same in that case, it's OK as long as they
are
> qualified with the CPAId.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
>
*************************************************************************************

>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>
*************************************************************************************

>
> Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com> on 11/20/2001 06:44:17 PM
>
> To:    Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>, dsmiley@mercator.com
> cc:    ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org, ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject:    RE: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Notes from BPSS/CPPA conference call
>
> Dan Weinreb asked:
>
> "It seems to me that this would mean that every message sent under the
> control of a particular BPSS would have the same Service value.  That
> is, all the messages sent by a given business process would all have
> the same value for Service.  Is that what was intended?"
>
> Yes, I think that is the current proposal under consideration.
>
> This convention would be coupled with the
> constraint that all distinct actions
> within the BPSS instance would have
> distinct names (both the short version
> names and the long Xpath names
> would be distinct within a "service")
>
> So an OrderManagement service would
> have PurchaseOrder ,  PurchaseOrderChange,
> PurchaseOrderCancel, PurchaseOrderAcknowledge
> actions, for example.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.ebtwg.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>