MulitPartyCollaboration roles correspond to BusinessRoles. Each
of them could perform multiple "Authorized roles"
But the specification does not preclude same party performing
multiple roles
in a binary collaboration.
For one bta it could perform the "Buyer" role and other BusinessTransactionActivity
same party could perform the role of a "Requestor".
Or, roles could be reversed for 2 BTAs.E.g. Binary Collaboration "Request
Inventory Report" from BPSS specification has roles reversed for
BusinessTransactionActivities happening in sequence.
Arvola Chan wrote:
Hima: In
a MultiPartyCollaboration, a BusinessPartnerRole may perform multiple initiating
roles and responding roles. Since the 1.1 CPP/A
spec is not capable of dealing with multi-party collaborations, I am only
worrying about BinaryCollaboration. In each BinaryCollaboration,
there is only one InitiatingRole and one RespondingRole. Regards,-Arvola
-----Original
Message-----
From: Himagiri(Hima) Mukkamala
<himagiri@sybase.com>
To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>
Cc: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>;
ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
<ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>;
ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org
<ebtwg-bps@lists.ebtwg.org>
Date: Monday, December 10,
2001 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] [ebxml-msg]
authorizedRole
One small correction.
fromAuthorizedRole and toAuthorizedRole don't always have to correspond
to the Initiator and Responder. If a BC has multiple BusinessTransactionActivities,
intermediate BTAs can have roles different to that of initiator/responder.
Only criteria is that they belong to list of Authorized roles specified
in BPSS.
I'm ccing bpss team, cause the schema is missing the AuthorizedRole
element.
In that sense there would be an Element called AuthorizedRoles?
in the bpss instance.
-hima
Arvola Chan wrote:
In BPSS, a BinaryCollaboration has an InitiatingRole
and a RespondingRole. A BinaryCollaboration may include one or more CollaborationActivities
and/or BusinessTransactionActivities. Each CollaborationActivity/BusinessTransactionActivity
has a fromAuthorizedRole and a toAuthorizedRole attribute. I believe that
the names of the InitiatingRole and RespondingRole of a BinaryCollaboration
must match the fromAuthorizedRole and toAuthorizedRole attributes of its
component BusinessTransactionActivities and CollaborationActivities. Anyway,
since authorizedRole is neither the name of an attribute or element, I
don't think it should be spelt as one word in section 3.1.1.2. Instead,
it should be spelt as "authorized role" without being in bold or italics.
If we want to explain what authorized role means, perhaps we can elaborate
within parenthesis as follows: authorized role (fromAuthorizedRole
or toAuthorizedRole) -Arvola -----Original
Message-----
From: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
To: ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
<ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:24
PM
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] [ebxml-msg]
authorizedRole
>FYI
>
>*************************************************************************************
>
>Martin W. Sachs
>IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
>P. O. B. 704
>Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
>914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
>Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
>Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>*************************************************************************************
>---------------------- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 12/10/2001
>04:23 PM ---------------------------
>
>David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
on 12/10/2001 03:42:32 PM
>
>To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
>cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Subject: [ebxml-msg] authorizedRole
>
>
>
>Chris, in section 3.1.1.2, there is an attribute/element called
>authorizedRole.
>It is our convention to bold/italics the names of elements and attributes,
>even
>if they are not ours.
>
>In CPPA I find fromAuthorizedRole and toAuthorizedRole.
>
>Where did this come from? Is it an element or attribute?
Should it be
>bold/italics?
>
>Regards,
>
>David.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
|