[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: (long) RE: [ebxml-cppa] Purpose of CertificateRef inCollaborationRole
-----Original Message-----
From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:11 PM To: Dale Moberg; ebXML-CPPA (E-mail) Cc: Peter Ogden Subject: Re: (long) RE: [ebxml-cppa] Purpose of CertificateRef in CollaborationRole Dale:
I was assuming that if certificate references are missing from
the NonRepudiation element, then perhaps the certificate reference included in
the CollaborationRole element may be used as the default. I agree that this is a
confusing optimization and that we should do away with the
defaultSigningCertificateRef attribute.
OK.
What should the element name be to indicate it is for use by a layer above the
MSH?
I think many implementations will want the MSH to sign on
behalf of the applications.
Dale >> Yes, I think this
is more typical than the financial use case.
Therefore, the
certificate references in the NonRepudiation element should be usable by the MSH
for signing purposes. Otherwise, where are we recording the signing certificate
that the MSH will be using?
Yes, I
agree that if nonrepudiation is handled by MSH (either origin or receipt) then
it goes under these elements.
In the 1.0 spec, section 7.6.5 NonRepudiation element, it is
stated:
"If the NonRepudiation element is omitted, the Messages are
not digitally signed."
Right, where Message signing is over both payload and SOAP
envelope as in ebMS.
The NonRepudiation and DigitalEnvelope elements under
DocExchange may be referenced by a DeliveryChannel that is used synchronously.
Therefore, each of NonRepudation and DigitalEnvelope should contain two
certificate references, one is required for the normal case, the other is
optionally used for signing or encrypting responses that must be returned
synchronously.
Can you elaborate why you think synchronous requires a
different CertificateRef approach?
I
guess I have not have expected that transport distinction
to
make a difference in terms of what keypairs
get
used in signing or enveloping....
Dale
-Arvola
-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com> To: ebXML-CPPA (E-mail) <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org> Cc: Peter Ogden <pogden@cyclonecommerce.com>; Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: (long) RE: [ebxml-cppa] Purpose of CertificateRef in CollaborationRole |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC