Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Appendices A, B and D

[Tony Weida <rweida@hotmail.com>]

Yes, I agree to wait.  --  Tony

----- Original Message -----

From: Arvola Chan

To: Tony Weida

Cc: CPPA

Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:23 PM

Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Re: Appendices A, B and D

Tony:

 

I think we should wait for the 1.08 draft before including the actual contents of the examples and schema into Appendices A, B, C and D. At that time, we also need to do some reformatting of these indices to make them more readable. I wonder if we can use a smaller font to avoid line wrapping in most cases. For those lines that do wrap, we may want to put attribute values on separate lines.

 

I can insert the copyright lines into the CPP and CPP examples, as well as the XSD file.

 

-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Weida <rweida@hotmail.com>
To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>
Cc: CPPA <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: Appendices A, B and D

Arvola,

Marty made the following suggestions concerning Appendices A, B, and D:
 

• For reader conveniences, the actual text of the examples and schema should be pasted into the specification when it goes up for TC approval. A statement could be added that in case of a discrepancy with the text files, the text files are normative.
• I suggest that the OASIS copyright line (line 3115) be inserted into the examples and schema as a comment at the very beginning.  So that the copies of the schema and examples that a vendor might include in a software package will contain the copyright statement.

Can you implement these changes?  If you disagree (or anyone else does) let me know and I'll put it in the issues list.

 

Thanks,

Tony