[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Timing parameter for syncReplyMode of signalsOnly
Hima:
UMM defines the use of Receipt Acknowledgment and Acceptance
Acknowledgment signals and provides the timing parameters
timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance. There is some brief
mention of synchronous response but that notion is not captured anywhere in
BPSS.
The BPSS and CPP/A teams have agreed that BPSS parameters can
be overriden by the CPA through setting of attributes in the
BusinessTransactionCharistics and MessagingCharacteristics
elements.
When we specify a syncReplyMode of signalsOnly, we are
effectively overriding the business process specification which would have
values for timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance. (Normally,
timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance would be greater than timeToAcknowledgeReceipt
because extra time is required for business rules validation.) The question I
have is: are we overriding timeToAcknowledgeReceipt by raising it to
timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance, or are we overriding timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance by
lowering it to timeToAcknowledgeRecept when we specify a syncReplyMode of
signalsOnly? Do we explicitly require that timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and
timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance be set to identical values whenever a syncReplyMode
of signalsOnly is specified?
-Arvola
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC