OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-cppa message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Timing parameter for syncReplyMode of signalsOnly


Hima:
 
UMM defines the use of Receipt Acknowledgment and Acceptance Acknowledgment signals and provides the timing parameters timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance. There is some brief mention of synchronous response but that notion is not captured anywhere in BPSS.
 
The BPSS and CPP/A teams have agreed that BPSS parameters can be overriden by the CPA through setting of attributes in the BusinessTransactionCharistics and MessagingCharacteristics elements.
 
When we specify a syncReplyMode of signalsOnly, we are effectively overriding the business process specification which would have values for timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance. (Normally, timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance would be greater than timeToAcknowledgeReceipt because extra time is required for business rules validation.) The question I have is: are we overriding timeToAcknowledgeReceipt by raising it to timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance, or are we overriding timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance by lowering it to timeToAcknowledgeRecept when we specify a syncReplyMode of signalsOnly? Do we explicitly require that timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance be set to identical values whenever a syncReplyMode of signalsOnly is specified?
 
-Arvola
-----Original Message-----
From: Himagiri(Hima) Mukkamala <himagiri@sybase.com>
To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>
Cc: ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Timing parameter for syncReplyMode of signalsOnly

Is this how UMM interprets it, i.e both the acks are sent at same time.

-hima

Arvola Chan wrote:

 If the business transaction calls for the use of both Receipt Acknowledgment and Acceptance Acknowledgment signals, and the messagingCharacteristics element in the CPA specifies a syncReplyMode of signalsOnly, I suppose both signals should be bundled into the same returned ebXML message. In this case, how long is the sender required to wait? Should it be governed by timeToAcknowledgeReceipt or timeToAcknowlegeAcceptance? Also, do we need to come up with an appropriate action name for the bundled signals? Should we specify an action value of 'ReceiptAndAcceptanceAcknowledgment'? -Arvola


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC