|
59. Publishing Party capabilities with a
CPA template instead of a CPP
I'll draft text for the forthcoming version
1.11.
Recommendation: leave open.
202. Order of presentation for attributes and
subelements
There are at least two interpretations of this issue:
- After the main section for a given element, subsections
for its attributes should precede subsections for its subelements. I
believe this criterion is currently satisfied.
- Within the main section, discussion of attributes should precede
discussion of elements. This criterion is often satisfied, but not
always. Sometimes the text flows most smoothly (in my opinion) when
discussion of attributes in the main section is followed directly by
further discussion of those attributes in the immediately following
subsections.
I raised this distinction with Peter O. in response to his
issue and await his rejoinder.
Recommendation: close as resolved. (Can still
consider specific cases of criterion 2 if anyone feels otherwise
when reviewing the text.)
215. Is name attribute of ProcessSpecification
element tied to BPSS?
The DB notes field says "Reopened: as discussed during
the Feb 7 call, the spec should state that the name attribute is IMPLIED and
characterize its value as informative only" and the disposition field says
"Pending Resolution: Arvola to check". I can draft text, run it by
Arvola, and include the result in version 1.11. As the assignee, Arvola
is of course welcome to draft text if he prefers.
Cheers,
Tony
|