[ebxml-cppa] RE: ebXML CPPA BALLOT version 2.0 Approval and OASISsubmission

[Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>]

I agree with Yukinori's observation about the necessity of the
timeToAcknowledgeReceipt attribute for the response action for synchronous
action bindings.

I have updated the CPP and CPA example files as well as the attached Word
document. I have also requested assistance from Paul Lorentz
(CycloneCommerce) to do the PDF conversion. The example files will be
reposted (overwriting their old versions) shortly.

-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: ECOMmail1@aol.com [mailto:ECOMmail1@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:34 AM
To: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; himagiri@sybase.com;
david@drummondgroup.com; arvola@tibco.com; y-saito@ecom.jp;
brian.hayes@commerceone.com; jamie.clark@mmiec.com;
pogden@cyclonecommerce.com; dsmiley@mercator.com; pallavi.g.malu@intel.com;
N_Kartha@stercomm.com; rweida@hotmail.com; kevin.liu@sap.com;
mwsachs@us.ibm.com; Jzheng@vitria.com; selim.aissi@intel.com;
Tony_Fletcher@btopenworld.com; pete@seebeyond.com;
arijit.sengupta@RosettaNet.org
Subject: Re: ebXML CPPA BALLOT version 2.0 Approval and OASIS submission


My comments about CPPA V2.0 is followings.

Dear Arvola:

Thank you very much for your alteration of examples.
I have checked XML document of examples of CPP-A, CPP-B, and CPA. And also I
have checked description of OtherPartyActionBinding, Appendix A and B in
CPPA
V2.0 specification.

I have recognized every alteration (within the comments that you said
'disposition: Updated') were completed except the following point.

I think that the description of timeToAcknowledgeReceipt of 'Purchase Order
Confirmation Action' is necessary. They are ABID7 of CPP-A and ABID7 of
CPP-B
for synchronous communication method.
But, in the current example (V2.0), there is no description of
timeToAcknowledgeReceipt of 'Purchase Order Confirmation Action'.
I have no confidence whether the timeToAcknowledgeReceipt of 'Purchase Order
Confirmation Action' under synchronous communication method should be
described or not.
If you think that it is better to add description of
timeToAcknowledgeReceipt
of 'Purchase Order Confirmation Action', please alter this point.

I am at Barcelona to attend XML Europe 2002, Because the address of my
e-mail
now is ECOM's temporally address for people of business trip, I cannot post
this e-mail to CPPA mail-server.

Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito
---------------------------------------------------
Yukinori Saito
Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan (ECOM)
E-mail: y-saito@ecom.jp
TEL: +81-3-3436-7542   FAX: +81-3-3436-7570
---------------------------------------------------


受信日時:2002/05/22 16:04:42 東京 (標準時)

dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.comからの引用:

<<
 Your reply to this ballot will be your vote.
 There are two issues on this ballot. At the
 last meeting the consensus was to vote by
 replying to everyone so that we all know
 how the vote has gone. I will save copies
 of the replies for the record. The time for voting
 is really bounded by the June 1 submission date.
 Please decide at the next teleconference (Arvola
 will chair) on the official ending time for voting.
 There is also a revised IBM IPR statement posted
 on our web site you may wish to examine.

 Arvola posted the 2.0 document to the list, and has sent
 it to the webmaster. A URL should be appearing soon for its location.
 Here are the issues for the voting members of the TC:

 ================

 FOR approval of the 2.0 specification as an ebXML-CPPA TC specification
    OR
 AGAINST approval of the 2.0 specification as an ebXML-CPPA TC
 specification

 ==================

 FOR approval of the 2.0 specification for OASIS submission
    OR
 AGAINST approval of the 2.0 specification for OASIS submission

 ==============
 by a date to be determined by consensus
 during teleconference but before the end of May.


 [This second action depends upon fulfilling the requirements
 for OASIS submission. Four member companies have indicated willingness
 to supply the statement needed, and I will be rounding those up
 before the end of June. Karl Best will also need to check again that all
 copyright
 and related statements are suitable for OASIS purposes.]

 Please see http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/guidelines.shtml
 for a review of voting processes.

 I did receive one post to the comment list from the outside.
 Unfortunately it was a spam soliciting the reader to click
 on a link to take a survey.

 Please let me know if I have omitted any voting members. I am sending to
 the
 list of members that according to my records are still eligible.
  >>

Attachment: ebcpp-2_0.doc
Description: MS-Word document