RE: [ebxml-cppa] Questions on IPR and Ballots for SpecificationApproval

[Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Friday is already scheduled.

Wednesday is to identify any issues that need
to be worked and followed up Friday. Otherwise
we will slide past the window for submission
(for the case that OASIS review gets approved).

I am sorry that the meetings are bunched but
this is because we are running up against
a hard deadline


Dale

-----Original Message-----
From: Arijit Sengupta [mailto:arijit.sengupta@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Dale Moberg
Cc: Cppa (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Questions on IPR and Ballots for Specification
Approval


Dale, please pick one day. Two voting meetings in one week is overkill.
I vote for Wed, but can make Friday if necessary. Regards,
Apu

Dale Moberg wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There remain several questions concerning
> IPR issues and how they may or may not
> impact implementations of the CPPA specification.
>
> Some recent questions, actions, and proposals
> made in response to the current balloting
> deserve TC consideration and discussion.
>
> I would like to schedule an additional voting meeting this
> week provided that a quorum of voting members can attend.
> I propose Wednesday at 8 AM Pacific Daylight Time as a
> supplementary voting meeting. I also propose allowing
> the regular Friday morning meeting to be a voting meeting.
>
> However, I think it is only fair that we not make these
> voting meetings unless a quorum can attend. A quorum is
> 50% of the voting membership (19), so 10 members are
> needed. Please send the list and/or me a statement
> of intent to attend the meetings Wednesday or Friday
> morning. Each meeting will be for a maximum of one hour.
>
> I should also point out that 10% of the voting membership
> is 2 members. So two no votes on either of
> the current issues will defeat them. I would encourage
> the TC to consider what should be our course of action
> should one or both of the issues fail
> as well as what should be done if they pass.
> I would like to see what the consenus of the TC
> is on these contingencies.
>
> Dale Moberg
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>