[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: RE: [StC BPSS Discussion]
FYI >X-Apparently-To: martin_w_sachs@sbcglobal.net via web80107.mail.yahoo.com; >20 Apr 2003 19:13:37 -0700 (PDT) >X-Originating-IP: [128.103.219.45] >From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com> >To: "UN/CEFACT TMG Business Processes WG" <uncefact-tmg-bpwg@listman.disa.org> >Cc: "UN/CEFACT TMG Business Processes WG" <uncefact-tmg-bpwg@listman.disa.org> >Subject: RE: [StC BPSS Discussion] >Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 03:14:04 +0100 >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 >Importance: Normal >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-uncefact-tmg-bpwg-30251E@listman.disa.org> >Reply-To: "UN/CEFACT TMG Business Processes WG" ><uncefact-tmg-bpwg@listman.disa.org> > >Dear Klaus, > >Given that I have sat in on and observed quite a few TMG StC meetings >already, may ask why you need to consult? Can you point me to the rules of >procedure that state that Teleconference StC meetings are treated any >differently from any other form of StC meeting. > >I recognise the rules of 'observing' at meetings so will use this >opportunity to 'say' a few things rather than the meeting. > >And whatever the issues might be I do hope they are resolved speedily and >amicably. One of the aims of the next release of BPSS was to more fully >align with ebXML Messaging and CPP/A. They both produced their version 2's >quite sometime ago and we need to speed up! > >The other aim for this release was just to fix any defects found by >implementers. Alignment with UMM (which is still not fully documented) was >never a goal for what was the 2.0 release (now renumbered to 1.1 I >understand) > >I think Brian (Hayes) had it right. When he was leading the BPSS team during >the last round of comments he asked all those making comments (which >included myself) to carefully consider whether the comment really needed to >be taken into account in the next release (then 2.0) or in a subsequent one >- 2.x or 3.0. The 3.0 release was the one targeted as full alignment with >the UMM as it then was, 2.0 for CPP/A and Messaging alignment issues plus >implementation fixes (and of course easy, agreed editorials) and 2.x for >enhancements that were not covered by 2.0 criteria but could be possible >incorporated before 3.0 > >Best Regards Tony >A M Fletcher > >Cohesions 1.0 (TM) > >Business transaction management software for application coordination > >Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK >Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701787 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7670 1785 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 >948219 >tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) > >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: StC BPSS Discussion >Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:16:15 -0700 >From: Klaus-Dieter Naujok <knaujok@attglobal.net> >Reply-To: "UN/CEFACT TMG BPSS Editing Team" ><uncefact-tmg-bpss@listman.disa.org> >To: "UN/CEFACT TMG BPSS Editing Team" <uncefact-tmg-bpss@listman.disa.org> > > > >All, > >As a followup to yesterdays request by Jim for a special StC meeting >regarding the scope, objective and requirements of the work on >BPSSV1.1, I attached Jim's official request as forwarded to the TMG >StC. The StC call is scheduled for Tuesday next week. > >As mention yesterday, if you have comments you like to pass onto the >StC before the call, please do so. You can either send a copy of your >comments to me directly or via THIS the BPSS list. > >I have also put before the StC the request to allow "observers" to >participate on the call. Due to this being Easter weekend an answer >will not be available until before Tuesday's call (scheduled for 7am >Pacific). If the StC agrees to the request I will provide the call-in >information at that time. > >Regards, > >Klaus > >-- >Klaus-Dieter Naujok UN/CEFACT/TMG Chair >Global e-Business Advisory Council Principal Advisor >+1.925.706.2954 http://www.ge-bac.com >http://www.klaus.naujok.name OR http://homepage.mac.com/knaujok >FingerPrint: ED3A 083E 1206 76A4 808E D0BA 9E6B 8A62 F95D E3CE > > > > > >--- >You are currently subscribed to the uncefact-tmg-bpwg listserve. >To unsubscribe send an email to lyris@listman.disa.org with the >following subject: Unsubscribe uncefact-tmg-bpwg >If you do not receive confirmation of your unsubscribe request >please notify postmaster@disa.org to report the problem. ************************************* Martin Sachs standards architect Cyclone Commerce msachs@cyclonecommerce.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]