[no subject]

"The CompositeList element SHALL be omitted from
Packaging when no security encapsulations or composite multiparts are 
used".

Have no idea from this statement. which link for packaging indicates
the simple part being used.

What I was proposing was to change the description of composite element 
to indicate that if there was only one constituent without encapsulation, 
then
mimetype does not correspond to composite mime types like 
multipart/signed, etc.
In this case mime/type of composite is same as constituent.
This is true where MSH acks do not carry a payload and can be sent as 
single mime parts.

Reason I was heading in this direction was to see packaging as source
of content description and hence later on when we make schema changes
provide a link to simple part without gong through composite.

Problem I see with dales suggestion is implementors looking to find a
"Packaging" element with packaingID from the ActionBinding, will 
be returned with a SimplePart and will amount to some changes.
--=_alternative 0059C84B88256DBB_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">From section 8.6.2 </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&quot;The CompositeList element SHALL
be omitted from</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Packaging when no security encapsulations
or composite multiparts are used&quot;.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Have no idea from this statement. which
link for packaging indicates</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">the simple part being used.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">What I was proposing was to change the
description of composite element </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">to indicate that if there was only one
constituent without encapsulation, then</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">mimetype does not correspond to composite
mime types like multipart/signed, etc.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In this case mime/type of composite
is same as constituent.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This is true where MSH acks do not carry
a payload and can be sent as single mime parts.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Reason I was heading in this direction
was to see packaging as source</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">of content description and hence later
on when we make schema changes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">provide a link to simple part without
gong through composite.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Problem I see with dales suggestion
is implementors looking to find a</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&quot;Packaging&quot; element with packaingID
from the ActionBinding, will </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">be returned with a SimplePart and will
amount to some changes.</font>
--=_alternative 0059C84B88256DBB_=--