Because the CPPA editor’s draft of
version 2.1 finally addresses (some of) the extensibility points, there are
options for adding new DocumentExchange specifications that would be the
natural place to document payload capabilities. For example, WSDL interface
descriptions/definitions are incorporated as extensions within the
DocumentExchange module. Probably before 2.1 gets TC approval it will add
support for other extensions of this kind. Maybe Jacques can help the CPPA
folks identify what “features and properties” need to be added for
full RosettaNet support.
Dale Moberg
From: Jacques Durand
[mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005
8:17 PM
To: 'Pete Wenzel'; Dale Moberg
Cc:
ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; Farrukh Najmi
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] FW:
[ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment
There is
the notion of "abstract trading partner agreement" (ATPA) in MMS
which roughly overlaps with a
subset of CPA. Some aspects of this ATPA are beyond
CPA (I believe, or else would
require some extensions), like payload capabilities.
(but there is no recommended format
for ATPA - of course CPAs will derive from it for
ebMS mapping)
Jacques
-----Original
Message-----
From: Pete Wenzel [mailto:pete@seebeyond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005
1:21 PM
To: Dale
Moberg
Cc: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org;
Farrukh Najmi
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] FW:
[ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment
Good
answers, Dale. I also was confused by this:
> 2.
Technical Architecture: In the area of implementation architecture, I
> think I have no problem on the
end-end components.
>
> a. I have some questions on
whether a dual-protocol (AS2 & ebMS)
> registry has been something
anyone has done before?
>
> Dale> I am not certain what
this means. The ebMS registry can be used to
> store ebXML information
concerning business processes (BPSS instances)
> as well as profiles for
messaging (CPPs and CPA templates). In the CPPA
> group, an editor's draft shows
how a CPP could be used to support AS2,
> but it is not released. So an
ebMS registry may eventually support
> profiles for AS2 if they
emerge. If the question was, can a Registry be
> accessed using AS2, I think
the answer at the moment is "no" [Including
> Farrukh on the list for
confirmation on this.]
and
assumed he was talking about participants who expose multiple
protocol endpoints, and how to
register them all. If AS2 had
something equivalent to CPP/CPA
that could be registered, that would
solve the problem. I wonder
if the RosettaNet MMS program is tackling
this issue?
--Pete
Pete Wenzel
<pete@seebeyond.com>
Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
To
unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS
TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-msg/members/leave_workgroup.php.