[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic-conform] MS Level 2 & 3 test reqs
Matt, I'll let you know about the "golden" version soon ( by conference call next Monday ). I'm "marking up" the MS spec right now for the test coverage document, and as I'm doing so, I'm doing a final editorial review of each requirement ( naming, typos...etc... ) . Mike At 04:17 PM 7/10/2002 -0700, Matthew MacKenzie wrote: >Jacques, > >I would be disappointed if the requirements didn't change after my initial >submission as the reason I submitted them was to get them by a wider group >of pros. You guys have done an awesome job on the editorial side. It is >quite gratifying to see such a large chunk of work come together in such a >short time, eh?! > >I have to apologize for not being as "gung ho" on the work items the past >couple of weeks. I've been juggling this with a proposal I'm doing for >Regrep 3 which has a deadline similar to this one, only with less >participation. I'll make it up by doing all of the nasty merging work >that needs to happen at the end of the process. Maybe I'll cheat and use >my company's transformation tool :-) > >Mike: let me know when you consider the CVS copy golden. I'll get to work >right away. > >-Matt > >On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 11:06 AM, Jacques Durand wrote: > >>Of course, ebXMLGlobal (Matt) contribution to the MS Test Reqs should not >>be forgotten: >>Matt provided the first cut at a list of Test Requirements, hope he does >>not mind the follow-up massaging :) >> >>Once the test requirements are finalized, that is good enough for MS TC >>release, >>but not yet for an MS Conformance test Suite: we will need to add the >>Test Cases definitions, and profiles definitions... >>I think that for Version 0.1 (internal TC review) we don't need all test >>cases: just a representative sample. >> >>While Mike / Matt finish-up the Test Reqs, I'll give a first shot at Test >>Cases and submit to the list (anyone interested too?) >>I just want us to agree on the format of Test Cases, before going further. >> >>Regards, >> >>jacques. >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@nist.gov] >>Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:30 AM >>To: Jacques Durand >>Cc: 'ebxml-iic-conform@lists.oasis-open.org' >>Subject: RE: [ebxml-iic-conform] MS Level 2 & 3 test reqs >> >>At 08:12 PM 7/9/2002 -0700, Jacques Durand wrote: >> >>Mike: >> >>Great milestone, you have been key to all this ! >>and thanks to all who gave comments. >>I see the following cosmetic remaining changes before we >>have something to submit to MS TC (do we all agree here?): >> >> >> >>[MIKE] - Thanks also to XML Global for providing the initial test >>requirements that >>we have been massaging :) >> >> >>- consolidate all these Levels in a single test req document that >>ignores the notion of levels, yet keeps the organization of test reqs by >>spec modules, >>only for the sake of ease of browsing. >>(levels/profiles would be defined separately, not needed for MS TC >>submission) >> >> >> >>[MIKE] - I agree. >> >> >>- renumber each test req item (ID) (Matt can help on this he said? >>Note: if we use a pure sequential numbering, we should not change them later >>as these will be referenced everywhere, and yet we should not expect them >>to remain >>contiguous in the test req doc, as we may have to add/remove some test >>reqs later based >>on feedback.) >> >> >> >>[MIKE] - I will leave the "merging/restructuring" of the 3 test >>requirements documents and >>XSL stylesheet to Matt, as he has volunteered to do the resequencing of >>the test requirements. >> >> >>- remove from this final copy the "Coverage" attribute (would go to the >>annotated spec) >> >> >> >>[MIKE] - This is a simple stylesheet change, as far as rendering in >>HTML. However, the "coverage" >>attribute is a valuable piece of information we may want to keep in the >>original XML document... >> >> >>Is that fine with everyone? >> >>Regards, >> >>jacques >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@nist.gov] >>Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:46 PM >>To: Jacques Durand >>Cc: 'ebxml-iic-conform@lists.oasis-open.org' >>Subject: RE: [ebxml-iic-conform] MS Level 2 & 3 test reqs >> >>Jacques and all, >> >> Here are the latest versions of levels 1,2 and 3 ebXML MS Conformance >>Testing Requirements. >>Incorporated are changes ( and a few not ) based upon comments. Further >>modifications based >>upon discussion is possible ( but we seem to be iterating to a conclusion :) >> >> I am also attaching comments to Monica's and Jacques comments ( >>already sent out comments >>for Michael Wang's post ). >> >> All my comments begin with [MIKE3] >> >>Regards, >>Mike >> >-- >Matthew MacKenzie >XML Global R&D >PGP Key available upon request. > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC