[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: FW: [ebxml-iic-interop] comments on Interop suite
Mike:
- my response to your comments attached (see three first test cases moslty)
No major issue.
- I gave a shot at the CPAs subset needed for the 10 interop test cases (here described in a very abstract way,
reusing some format we had in TestFramework). Probably need be more precise. It seems that we need six...
(very little variation from one to the other). Comments?
regards,
Jacques
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) urn:config:cpa_basic (default) (for test cases 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<JD> Name changed for consistency with the test case scripting from Mike.?
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: None
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Not required
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required (do we need this line? It is more business level, not MSH)
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: No
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Not required
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Urn:config:cpa_basic_signed (for test cases 1.5, 1.6)
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: None
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Not required
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: Yes
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Not required
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Urn:config:cpa_basic_syncresponse (for test cases 1.7)
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: signalsAndResponse
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Not required
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: No
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Not required
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Urn:config:cpa_basic_reliable (for test cases 1.8)
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: None
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Yes
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: No
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Not required
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Urn:config:cpa_basic_reliablesig (for test cases 1.9)
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: None
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Yes
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: Yes
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Yes (is that what will get the Ack signed?)
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6) Urn:config:cpa_basic_reliablesync (for test cases 1.10)
Transport:
Protocol HTTP 1.1
SyncReplyMode: mshSignalsOnly
Reliability:
Retry/Timeout
Receipt Acknowledgement: Yes
Response: Not required
Response Acknowledgement: Not required
Duplicate Check : None
Order: No
Security:
Encryption: No
Signature: No
Non-Repudiation
Origin Not required
Receipt Not required
Multi Hop: No
Error:
ErrrorURI: <URI of driver party>
- -----Original Message-----
- From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@nist.gov]
- Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:32 PM
- To: Jacques Durand; 'mmartin@certivo.net'
- Cc: 'matt@mac-kenzie.net'
- Subject: Re: FW: [ebxml-iic-interop] comments on Interop suite
- Jacques and all,
- Here are my comments to your comments regarding Interop Test Scripting.
- ( Comments preceded by [MIKE] )
- Cheers,
- Mike
- At 06:13 PM 1/7/2003 -0800, Jacques Durand wrote:
- Mike, Monica, Matt:
- Not sure if you are on the iic-interop list, so resending to you just in case...
- Jacques
- -----Original Message-----
- From: Jacques Durand [mailto:JDurand@fsw.fujitsu.com]
- Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:25 PM
- To: 'ebxml-iic-interop@lists.oasis-open.org'
- Subject: [ebxml-iic-interop] comments on Interop suite
- Hello:
- Here is a few more comments (I also consolidated a few from Monica) on the Interop spec, for Steve.
- Also, comments on the test case scripting from Mike (I cast his HTML doc in a Word doc, for
- ease of updates.) A few generic comments for now (that apply probably to most test cases.)
- Still needs more detailed review. Most of them hinge on the fact that in Interop test,
- we don't control much the details of message envelope, as we stay above MSH level.
- Cheers,
- <<BIP_testsuite.zip>>
Attachment:
BIP_testcases_scripting_MK_JD_MK.doc
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC