|
Good job everyone (and many thanks for Steve Yung who has been helping
us all along on BIP).
Here are a few comments to recent BIP (from Mike Kass) in preparation
for email vote:
1. On section 3.3, should we not preclude that a series of conversations
may be chained together for end-to-end or more packaged testing?
ref: Recommended in each test case there is a unique conversation ID. (line
602-3)
2. On section 3.2 and Kass comment on test framework vs. test suite
requirements, perhaps we reference the metadata and recognize the metadata
could be used as pre-conditions for test execution. Then, reference
back to the Test Framework where there we say what is in/out of scope for
1.0.
3. Also in section 3.2, suggest you at least reference confidentiality
and authentication in the section even if not in the table as it is not
used by the test. Only a suggestion, not a hard-fast request.
Thanks, everyone.
Monica
Michael Kass wrote:
Jacques
and all, Here
are the latest diffs for today's teleconference. I have not done
the merge yet. Mike
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:44
PM
Subject: [ebxml-iic-interop] interop
suite last edits.
Monica:
iteration on your comments (see my
inserts in red, I rephrased some of my old inserts).
Overall agree with your updates.
Can we consider you as acting editor
of the MS Interop suite for now?
I will look into Serm's asap.
Cheers,
Jacques
<<IIC_MS_Basic_Interop_TestSuite_v09_JD_MK_mm1_sk1_mk2_JD2_032803.doc>>
|