Re: [ebxml-iic] Phone in numbers for next week's OAG meeting at N IST

[Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xmlglobal.com>]

Jacques,

A couple of comments/questions:

- What is the technical justification for using a subset of JMS?  Is 
this appropriate for all MSH implementations?  Should we be language 
biased in the abstract definition of procedures?

- How will acknowledgments be tested?  I assume that the test suite 
would have a dummy HTTP and/or SMTP listener to collect asynch acks and 
errors on?

Regards,

Matt


On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 06:39  AM, Jacques Durand wrote:

> All:
>
> A few slides crafted after discussions yesterday,
> (and resulting of prior work in MS CTTF / ITTF)
> that are likely to be discussed today, during the
> OAG / NIST tetsbed discussion.
> (These are just draft - no committment from IIC - to feed discussion
> and feedback, mostly.)
> Will send more later.
>
> Reminder: there should be 2 joint discussions today:
> - 10:00am - 11:00am (EST)(starts 15mn after this mail...)
> - 1:30pm  -3:30pm
>
> regards,
>
> Jacques Durand
>
>  
>
>
--
Matthew MacKenzie
XML Global R&D
PGP Key available upon request.