OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-iic message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-iic] Latest BIP Test Suite Specification up for vote:


Monica:
 
Not sure how to take your vote:
- are you saying you vote NO on the document out for vote as it is, unless we add a statement on
a conformance clause to the suite?
 
I remember we have discussed something like:
"A detailed conformance clause for the MS BIP test suite will be defined in the next version of
this document.", but dont recall formal proposal on this to the editor.
Mike actually consulted NIST "conformance experts", and reason to not add anything
is that these experts believe that conformance statements to a test suite are quite unusual. 
 
Monica: can you tell the statement you think would be adequate?
(Note that we could also have a blanket statement like the one we used in TestFramework section 1.2.)
 
 
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Michael Kass
Cc: Jacques Durand; ebXML IIC - main list (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] Latest BIP Test Suite Specification up for vote:

I vote YES for the BIP, with the one caveat on a statement regarding future discussion regarding conformance to the BIP that I passed to Jacques on Monday.

Thanks.
Monica

Michael Kass wrote:

To all,    Attached is version 1.0 of the ebMS V2.0 Basic Interoperability Test Suite Specification.We will put this document to a vote (5 days of email voting, starting this afternoon April 7, 8pm PT,
closing Saturday, April 12, 8pm PT) Regards,Mike  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: [ebxml-iic] latest updates before review and vote:
 All:

We will put to review/vote (5 days of email voting, starting this afternoon 6pm PT,
closing Saturday 12, 6pm PT, the two specs:
- MS Basic Interperability Profile Test Suite 1.0
- EAN-UCC deployment guide 1.0

Before this, can I ask each editor to wrap-up the final updates we discussed:

summary of changes (did I miss any?):

- EAN-UCC deployment guide:
Should add in front page something like:
"Instance of the IIC Deployment Guide Template V1.0"
(before or after the "for ebXML MS spec 2.0")

- ebXML Deployment Guide Template: 2 remarks, before we post our voted TC spec:
o should be titled ebXML *Messaging* Deployment Guide Template
o should have the explicit reference to MS 2.0  that EAN has in its front page:
"for ebXML MS spec 2.0"

- BIP test suite:
o remove ref to negative interop test in 1.3.5.
o remove CPA placeholder ref in 3.3 (or should we just refer to CPPA spec for such examples?)
o remove "timeToLive" from table in 3.3 as well as in 4.1.2 table.
o [ebMSInteropReqs] ref is still unknown: should we just give, like for all other placeholders
for our own specs and material:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebxml-iic
which is the URL of IIC page.
o . In 4.2, I think we should say:
"The XML version of  the test requirements, conforming to the TestFramework [ebTestFramework],
can be found in [ebMSInteropReqs]." instead of:
"The normative test requirements can be found in [ebMSInteropReqs]."
(because "normative" should only be used for material with regard to this present spec.)

Regards,

Jacques
 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]