RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues

[Dale Moberg <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

OK, since your issues are the agenda,
we should wait. The following week
Friday is out for me. Is Thursday 
at 3 Eastern possible? I will assume
yes unless you post otherwise.

Dale Moberg

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:10 PM
To: Dale Moberg; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues


I won't be able to make it Friday at 11; I'm chairing a session at that
time. I'm pretty booked for the entire week; for me it would be best to
put this off until next week.

</karl>
=================================================================
Karl F. Best
OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
978.667.5115 x206
karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Moberg [mailto:dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:50 PM
> To: Karl F. Best; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
>
>
> It looks like there is an agenda for a meeting,
> so the next step is to find a good time to have
> one. I propose this Friday,
> Dec. 14, 8 Pacific, 11 Eastern
> and appropriately adjusted elsewhere. The agenda
> can be discussion of the 2 issues raised below
> and anything else that people send in.
>
> Dale Moberg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ebxml-jc] two issues
>
>
> JC:
>
> A couple of issues I need to raise:
>
> 1. As you are probably aware, the Vienna ebXML MoU between OASIS and
> UN/CEFACT specified that each side would have three voting
> reps and two
> non-voting technical rep to a joint management group. OASIS'
> three reps
> are Patrick Gannon (OASIS CEO), Simon Nicholson, and Norbert
> Mikula, all
> from the OASIS Board of Directors. I am one of the non-voting
> technical
> reps, and we are in need of a second. The OASIS Board would
> like the JC
> to nominate a person to fill that role; the Board would then make the
> final decision.
>
> Responsibilities of the rep are to attend meetings of the joint
> management team to represent OASIS technical activities. Meetings are
> bi-weekly phone calls, and possible occasional f2f meetings that would
> likely be scheduled to coincide with other meetings (I don't
> think we'd
> ever schedule a stand-alone meeting; we want to keep this
> light-weight.)
>
> 2. You're probably aware that the Vienna agreement also stated that
> there would be a joint architecture team to design the next
> phase of the
> ebXML specs. ebTWG has gone ahead and formed an architecture team on
> their side, and are waiting for OASIS to do the same. The two teams
> would then comprise the joint team, or perhaps send reps to be members
> of the joint team.
>
> The OASIS Board would like to hear recommendations from the
> JC on how to
> form the architecture team and how it should operate. For
> example, does
> the JC itself want to be the OASIS architecture team? Or
> should it be a
> separate TC or JC? Should it be restricted to ebXML only, or would it
> define an architecture for all OASIS e-business technical work?
>
>
> Dale: would you please put these two items on the agenda for
> the next JC
> meeting? (BTW, when is it?)
>
> </karl>
> =================================================================
> Karl F. Best
> OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
> 978.667.5115 x206
> karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>