OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-jc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues


I would like to add 2 issues to the agenda:

1. How should references to not yet approved
standards be handled? For example, the BPSS
version 1.1 will probably lag CPPA. CPPA
will probably lag Messaging.

2. We have a draft specification that
straddles groups (normative spec on
how to populate Message fields with
values from a CPA.) Is there a joint
TC approval process? Can a spec be
jointly issued? If a spec must be
issued by one TC, how can another
TC be given a voice in its discussion?

(Conformance specs may have similar
issues.)


Thanks Dale Moberg

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:43 AM
To: Dale Moberg; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues


Thurs 20th at 3:00 EST is fine with me.

</karl>
=================================================================
Karl F. Best
OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
978.667.5115 x206
karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Moberg [mailto:dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: Karl F. Best; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
>
>
> OK, since your issues are the agenda,
> we should wait. The following week
> Friday is out for me. Is Thursday
> at 3 Eastern possible? I will assume
> yes unless you post otherwise.
>
> Dale Moberg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:10 PM
> To: Dale Moberg; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
>
>
> I won't be able to make it Friday at 11; I'm chairing a
> session at that
> time. I'm pretty booked for the entire week; for me it would
> be best to
> put this off until next week.
>
> </karl>
> =================================================================
> Karl F. Best
> OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
> 978.667.5115 x206
> karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dale Moberg [mailto:dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:50 PM
> > To: Karl F. Best; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
> >
> >
> > It looks like there is an agenda for a meeting,
> > so the next step is to find a good time to have
> > one. I propose this Friday,
> > Dec. 14, 8 Pacific, 11 Eastern
> > and appropriately adjusted elsewhere. The agenda
> > can be discussion of the 2 issues raised below
> > and anything else that people send in.
> >
> > Dale Moberg
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 12:59 PM
> > To: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ebxml-jc] two issues
> >
> >
> > JC:
> >
> > A couple of issues I need to raise:
> >
> > 1. As you are probably aware, the Vienna ebXML MoU between OASIS and
> > UN/CEFACT specified that each side would have three voting
> > reps and two
> > non-voting technical rep to a joint management group. OASIS'
> > three reps
> > are Patrick Gannon (OASIS CEO), Simon Nicholson, and Norbert
> > Mikula, all
> > from the OASIS Board of Directors. I am one of the non-voting
> > technical
> > reps, and we are in need of a second. The OASIS Board would
> > like the JC
> > to nominate a person to fill that role; the Board would
> then make the
> > final decision.
> >
> > Responsibilities of the rep are to attend meetings of the joint
> > management team to represent OASIS technical activities.
> Meetings are
> > bi-weekly phone calls, and possible occasional f2f meetings
> that would
> > likely be scheduled to coincide with other meetings (I don't
> > think we'd
> > ever schedule a stand-alone meeting; we want to keep this
> > light-weight.)
> >
> > 2. You're probably aware that the Vienna agreement also stated that
> > there would be a joint architecture team to design the next
> > phase of the
> > ebXML specs. ebTWG has gone ahead and formed an architecture team on
> > their side, and are waiting for OASIS to do the same. The two teams
> > would then comprise the joint team, or perhaps send reps to
> be members
> > of the joint team.
> >
> > The OASIS Board would like to hear recommendations from the
> > JC on how to
> > form the architecture team and how it should operate. For
> > example, does
> > the JC itself want to be the OASIS architecture team? Or
> > should it be a
> > separate TC or JC? Should it be restricted to ebXML only,
> or would it
> > define an architecture for all OASIS e-business technical work?
> >
> >
> > Dale: would you please put these two items on the agenda for
> > the next JC
> > meeting? (BTW, when is it?)
> >
> > </karl>
> > =================================================================
> > Karl F. Best
> > OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
> > 978.667.5115 x206
> > karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
>
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC