[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] Proposed discussion items at next meeting, whenever scheduled (2004?)
Karl, We have this on the agenda for the ebXML JC in January (Jan 7, 9:00 am PT). Maybe we can discuss how this might be coordinated, and what the agenda might be at that time. Thanks, Kathryn -----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:14 PM To: Breininger, Kathryn R Cc: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org; dee.schur@oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ebxml-jc] Proposed discussion items at next meeting, whenever scheduled (2004?) Kathryn: I see no problem with New Orleans being the venue for the joint ebXML meetings; you just need to let Dee know in advance how many people and rooms etc. We're planning for two days (Wed-Thur) for the TC meetings but if you need three (Wed-Fri) then I'm sure that could be arranged too. If you'd prefer a standalone event I'm sure Dee can help put that together, but staff would prefer to see ebXML meeting together with the other TCs at New Orleans. We'd like to have as many TCs in one place at one time as possible, and will be holding the OASIS annual members meeting that week too. -Karl Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: > Karl, > The original question was from Dale (snipped from e-mail below): > > >>>>1. Would it be useful to attempt to coordinate an ebXML 2004 TC >>>>conference where all TCs meet during (portions of) one week? Because >>>>there are potentially areas of overlap in interests (Messaging and >>>>CPPA, CPPA and BPSS, IIC and everyone, Registry and CPPA,BPSS) >>>>meetings would need to be scheduled to overlap to some degree for >>>>joint meetings. >>>> >>>>But because several participants are in multiple groups, the >>>>schedules would also need to be staggered for other time intervals. >>>>Also groups need to have dedicated time to work on their own >>>>distinctive problems. >>>> >>>>Would the resulting schedule be too difficult to create given all >>>>the >>> >>>>constraints? >>> > > I think the intent here was to coordinate a joint meeting for all of > the TCs to come together, rather than TCs meeting individually for > their own TC face-to-face meetings. Dale, is my assumption correct > here? From the e-mail Carol just sent out, I was under the impression > this was providing meeting rooms for TCs to use, not a coordinated > joint TC conference. > > Kathryn > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:05 PM > To: Breininger, Kathryn R > Cc: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ebxml-jc] Proposed discussion items at next meeting, > whenever scheduled (2004?) > > > Dee just sent out a note about an OASIS Symposium the week of 26 April > in New Orleans. Opportunity for joint meetings then. I'm sure that we > could also do something in Amsterdam. > > The TCs just need to decide which, and then notify Dee so that she can > make arrangements for rooms. > > -Karl > > > > Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: > >>Karl, >>The Registry TC met yesterday, and I asked about interest in a joint >>ebXML TC meeting. There was interest expressed in meeting jointly >>with other ebXML TCs. >> >>One suggestion that came forward was to consider having a joint ebXML >>TC meeting at XML Europe, as there may be more international >>attendance. I am passing on the suggestion. >> >>Kathryn >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org] >>Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 6:31 AM >>To: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: Re: [ebxml-jc] Proposed discussion items at next meeting, >>whenever scheduled (2004?) >> >> >>In regards to the first item, the TAB is planning a two-day symposium >>to >> >>discuss web service topics, and we'll probably also have a chance for >>co-located TC meetings at the same venue. This is for either the week > > of > >>5 April or 26 April (the latter more likely), and in either Memphis or >>New Orleans (latter more likely). More details as they become >>available... >> >>-Karl >> >> >>Monica J. Martin wrote: >> >> >>>Dale Moberg wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I have two items for discussion at the next JC. >>>> >>>>1. Would it be useful to attempt to coordinate an ebXML 2004 TC >>>>conference where all TCs meet during (portions of) one week? Because >>>>there are potentially areas of overlap in interests (Messaging and >>>>CPPA, CPPA and BPSS, IIC and everyone, Registry and CPPA,BPSS) >>>>meetings would need to be scheduled to overlap to some degree for >>>>joint meetings. >>>> >>>>But because several participants are in multiple groups, the >>>>schedules would also need to be staggered for other time intervals. >>>>Also groups need to have dedicated time to work on their own >>>>distinctive problems. >>>> >>>>Would the resulting schedule be too difficult to create given all >>>>the >>> >>>>constraints? >>>> >>>> >>> >>>mm1: Yes, good idea for the spring. >>> >>> >>> >>>>2. An OASIS TC, WS-CAF, met in Waltham MA last week. WS-CAF >>>>ambitiously plans to develop both Coordination and ( a family of) >>>>Transaction protocols, as well as a lower level "Context" >>>>service/SOAP-header-block. ebBP (BPSS) may wish to consider >>>>coordination with this group, and ebXML Messaging may wish to >>>>consider coordination with this group for its 3.x major release >>>>(when >>> >>>>SOAP 1.2 and SOAP 1.2 based web services will probably be allowed as >>>>a simple case of ebXML Messaging). Some areas of >>>>interaction/integration: BPSS signal approach being extended to >>>>allow message traffic devoted to coordination and/or the (3 and >>>>counting) variants of Transaction. This assumes that ebBP is >>>>compatible with >>> >>web >> >> >>>>services (specifically, WSDL (2.0)specified SOAP interchanges). We >>> >>may >> >> >>>>wish to invite one or more of the chairs to discuss integration >>> >>points >> >> >>>>at some point. This could be done at JC level or at TC level, >>> >>however. >> >> >>>>The Context service has functionality similar to the >>>>"ConversationID" >>> > >>>>functionality found in ebXML Messaging 2.0. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>mm1: This is a good idea and not unforeseen. This has already been >>>broached as an idea. We should bring up liaisons in the ebBP not 15 >>>December but the other meeting before the end of the year. >>> >>> >>> >>>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>>>roster >>> > >>>>of the OASIS TC), go to >>>> >>> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-jc/members/leave_wo >>rk >>group.php. >> >> >>> >>> >>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster >>>of the OASIS TC), go to >>> >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-jc/members/leave_wo >>rk >>group.php. >> >> >>> >> > > -- ================================================================= Karl F. Best Vice President, OASIS office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-jc/members/leave_work group.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]