[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] an update
(a). TC Discussion Lists
Any group of at least three Eligible Persons shall be authorized to begin a publicly subscribable discussion list for the purpose of forming a TC by submitting to OASIS TC Administration the following items:
No later than 15 days following the submission, OASIS TC Administration shall provide these materials to the membership with a Call For Participation in a discussion list whose purpose is to form the TC described in the application. Discussion of TC formation shall begin on the list no sooner than seven days after the announcement. More than one TC can be formed from a discussion list. A list established to discuss the formation of a TC under provisions of this section shall automatically go out of existence 90 days after the call for participation, together with its archive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacques Durand [mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:50 PM
To: 'ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [ebxml-jc] an updateQuick update on the call today (restating minutes):
- we have given homework to everyone who did not complain (including absentees ;-)
1. White paper:
we'd like to see a rough outline (bullet list of what would be developed in each part of the paper) by next meeting (October 6).
That is not too hard a first step: takes between 30mn and 1h for each assignee.
See the current structure of the paper below, which is still flexible.
Parts have beem (partially) assigned as follows.1. ebXML: the Requirements, the Approach (TBD, thinking of a marketing team member, David Webber?)
2. Messaging (preferred: Ian - can reuse one of your presentations material? someone from MS TC can assist here too)
3. Business Transactions and Collaborations (Monica/Dale)
4. Collaboration Protocol Agreements (Dale)
5. The Registry-Repository (Kathryn)
6. Standardizing COntent (Jon Bosak?)
7. Testing ebXML (Jacques)
8. Deploying ebXML in a SOA environment (Matt)
9. Who deploys ebXML today (a marketing person may consolidate and edit the input we provide)
2. ebXML Adoption discussion list:
I propose we create this list asap with participants below
(at same time we are considering broadening the sending of the invite to ebxml-mktg / ebxml-dev. Any opinion on this?)- members of JC (let us know if you don't)
- Joe Speed (jspeed@cyclonecommerce.com)
- Lisa Schiltz (lschiltz@us.fujitsu.com)
- Dick Brooks (dick@tech-comm.com)
- Patrick Hogan (phogan@sinotechnologies.com)
- David Webber (david@drrw.info)
- OASIS management (Carol? other?)Regards,
Jacques
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ebXML White Paper Synopsis
==========================NOTES:
- the audience is "technical executive", say CTO and IT management, since they are decision makers on
adopting ebXML. Yet the style should resonate with vertical users with a B2B experience (e.g. EDI).
- also, for those already familiar with ebXML, the paper should give a feel of the future version.
- Each section would average 3-5 pages (overall paper between 30-50 pages, including figures).
Sections don't have to give an exhaustive view of the material referred to, nor a balanced summary,
but should convey the rationale behind it, and may focus on a few remarkable features.
Each section could include a short FAQ at the end.
- The outline below is rather classic, in breaking down by component. It could be different: describe
first the ISO version, then separately the future version (But the latter is too unstable today to deserve
a full section.) Or, could downplay the components and focus more on the integrated view, how everything
works together, giving away features details while unwinding scenarios & use cases. I though it would
be sufficient to have Section 1 do a bit of this binding-it-all-together job.
- we could involve marketing team to do Section #9.
1. ebXML: the Requirements, the Approach
- short definition: an ISO standard for Exchanging business messages, Conducting trading relationships,
Defining and registering business processes, Communicating data in common terms, Assembling business transactions.
- the business case (EDI-compatible in both content and architecture, accessible to SMEs, non-managed env.,
covering all partners of a supply chain, XML-based)
- an integrated approach of B2B focusing on interoperability needs, yet loose coupling with back-end systems.
- transitioning to ebXML (migration path)
- anatomy of an ebXML deployment (showing architecture, the interaction steps in usage scenarios)2. Messaging
- Overview of current version
(requirements & design principles, summary of salient features, some use cases, relationship with other ebXML parts)
(this has to be described in a creative way: not a tech report, but rationale and differentiation with what
exists outside)
- the roadmap: what is next, the new requirements. (Web services protocols, payload services, richer MEPs...)3. Business Transactions and Collaborations
- Overview of current version
(requirements & design principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other ebXML parts)
- the roadmap: what is next, the new requirements.4. Collaboration Protocol Agreements
- Overview of current version
(requirements & design principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other ebXML parts)
- the roadmap: what is next, the new requirements.5. The Registry-Repository
- Overview of current version
(requirements & design principles, summary of salient features, use case, relationship with other ebXML parts)
- the roadmap: what is next, the new requirements.6. Standardizing COntent
- Core components (requirements & design principles, summary of salient features)
- UBL7. Testing ebXML
- Summary of Interop tests in US, Asia, Europe.
- the role of IIC, test suites and test framework.8. Deploying ebXML in a SOA environment
- where ebXML fits in (example arch from GM)
- pilot projects (AIAG...)9. Who deploys ebXML
- survey
- what do people do with ebXML, value they see.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]