RE: [ebxml-jc] 1/12/2005: ebxml-jc Meeting Minutes 12 January 2005

["Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Good to hear that there are still open processes somewhere that proceed
uninfluenced by PACs and power brokers... :-)

Dale

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Dale Moberg
Cc: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] 1/12/2005: ebxml-jc Meeting Minutes 12 January
2005

     Sure it would.  OASIS policy is not to prevent efforts, or screen 
their appropriateness:  we just lean on 'em during intake to try and
make 
their scope as clear and inclusive as possible.  But ultimately if it's 
well-defined, not illegal, not outside the entire scope of OASIS work
(say, 
a Llama Anatomy TC), and has the requisite # of proposers, it gets a
shot.  JBC

At 09:04 AM 1/12/2005, Dale Moberg wrote:
>If you are asking about my remark, it was wondering whether an OASIS TC
>would be approved for SOA architecture without very large software
>groups, being on board with it.  * * *