[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-jc] deployment template
Jacques Durand wrote: > This is attached the current ebMS 2 deployment template (an instance > filled-in by EAN-UCC is available on IIC site). > > > > The template - to be updated - allows a user community to "profile" > the usage of ebMS2. > > We are trying to define a more generic template structure that applies > to all specs. > > > > A usage profile is typically made of: > > 1. sub-selection of major feature modules or roles in a specification. > > 2. within a feature module, selection of options (for recommendation, > or for strict requirement by the community) > > 3. within a feature module, profiling of content (e.g. format of a > PartyId values, set of sub-elements required) > > These recommendations may be made of assertions or of dependency rules > (e.g. if you use this feature, don't use that one) > > > > For each individual feature subject to profiling, the template would > provide a small structure: > > - specification feature (definition and spec reference) > > - proposed profiling (narrow an option or define content) > > - test case reference (optional) > > - usage profile concerned > > > > A community may decide to generate several user profiles. > mm1: Jacques, thank you for forwarding. In pursuing (in part) two complementary goals [1], perhaps we look more closely at this deployment template and scope, to test: * Use of BT patterns and operational semantics * Mapping/conformance of business requirements in deployment To that end, secent draft update on CPPA-ebBP mapping (v2.1 and v2.0 respectively): attached. We also have the BT characteristics in CPPA and those could also be mapped (and relate to ebMS). Thanks. [1] a) Starting development of ebBP test assertions, b) maximizing the use of the test suite across ebMS-CPPA-ebBP > > > So we see a pattern of profiling here that we'll try to keep generic > enough as an XML markup + xsl transform for HTML. > > (if you have some comment / additions to the above, let me know) > > > > Regards, > > > > Jacques > ======== v2.1 CPPA draft extract * * *ebBPSS Version 1.** ** * * *ebCPPA Version 2.0* * * *Status* */ProcessSpecification/@uuid/* */ProcessSpecification/@uuid/* *Required* */ProcessSpecification/@uuid/* */Service/@name/* *Required* */BinaryCollaboration/Role/@name/* */CollaborationRole/Role/@name/* *Recommended* */RequestingBusinessActivity/@name/* */ThisPartyActionBinding@action/* *Recommended* */RespondingBusinessActivity/@name/* */ThisPartyActionBinding@action/* *Recommended* * * *ebBPSS Version 2.** * * *ebCPPA Version 2.1* * * ** * * ** */ProcessSpecification/@uuid/* */ProcessSpecification/@uuid/* *Required* */BusinessCollaboration/@name/* */BinaryCollaboration/@name/* */MultiPartyCollaboration/@name/* */Service/* *Recommended* *(Note: only where @isInnerCollaboration* * is false)* */BusinessCollaboration/Role/@name BinaryCollaboration/Role/@name/* */MultiPartyCollaboration/Role/@name/* */CollaborationRole/Role/@name/* *Required* */RequestingBusinessActivity/@name/* */ThisPartyActionBinding@action/* *Recommended*
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]