[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] FW: ISO TC215 e-Business study; minutes San Diego; Questionaire - ACTION REQUIRED by Feb. 22nd
|
Thanks Jacques! We can use this to get
started!
Kathryn
Kathryn Breininger From: Durand, Jacques R. [mailto:JDurand@us.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:40 PM To: Breininger, Kathryn R; ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org; monica.martin@sun.com Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] FW: ISO TC215 e-Business study; minutes San Diego; Questionaire - ACTION REQUIRED by Feb. 22nd All:
sorry
could not make the call this morning.
Agree
for a common response to the questionnaire.
I had
started to draft some - see below -, speaking for my company - but most
questions call for a concerted response.
Jacques
Questions:
1. Which sector and/or group do you represent?
(Healthcare, Business, ICT, Standardisation, ........)
ICT (Information &
COmmunication Techs vendor and
Standardization)
2. What do you think can be the benefit of using ebXML
for TC215 and or HL7?
- a technology for
messaging based on open standards, providing the best support for XML document
yet supportive of any other format.
- no strong dependency
on any IT vendor proprietary platform, and a rich open-source community that
allows a large consortium to customize, own and shape an
eBusiness/eGov solution.
3. Which parts of ebXML are of most interest for
TC215
- ebMS (messaging) is
usually considered as the baseline for B2B communication. Then, ebBP (bus
process and transactions), and CPPA (collaboration profiles/agreements). In more
advanced phases of a deployment, registry an repository provide great value for
governance and management functions. [ idea is to
show all parts have interest, but indicate some
phasing]
4. Which areas of the healthcare domain can use ebXML as
it is (Patient records, reimbursement, .........)
See NHS in UK, CDC in US.
5. Is there a need for TC215 to support the ebXML
development process in common (not only Healthcare)?
Not sure what "development process" means here
(deployment?)
Some profiling and usage
practices may need be developed with all parties
involved, even if a pilot deployment will be restricted to one
sector in a first phase.
6. Organisational viewpoint: How can we work together in
the future with ISO, OASIS, UN/cefact and others for e-Business (New liasons,
participation in other groups, a new WG or task Force within TC215,
......)?
- For getting
requirements, a usual liaison channel between OASIS TC and TC215 WG may be
sufficient.
- ebXML TCs also
encourage user consortiums to publish their "deployment profile" of ebXML
(user-defined conventions above the standard, and deployment practices). OASIS
TC can publish these. Some templates support this. Some tighter cooperation to
help on this profiling may be needed (see how RosettaNet created task forces
involving experts from RosttaNet, OASIS, companies, to do this outside the
OASIS umbrella)
- the very recent http://ebxml.xml.org/ site from OASIS
allows ebXML users to create forums, blogs, etc.
7. If a new TC215 WG is proposed, what should be the
main target of this group. From: Breininger, Kathryn R [mailto:kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:09 PM To: ebxml-jc@lists.oasis-open.org; monica.martin@sun.com Subject: [ebxml-jc] FW: ISO TC215 e-Business study; minutes San Diego; Questionaire - ACTION REQUIRED by Feb. 22nd Importance: High Hi,
Please take a look at attached minutes and at the set of questions
below. The ebXML JC agreed that it would be best to compile a single response to
the questions. Monica and I took an action item to put together a first
draft by the end of this week so there is time for the JC to review and add
comments. We plan to draw much of the response material from the White
Paper the JC produced last year. As agreed in the JC meeting, the focus of
the response will be the practical use of ebXML and that it is a framework that
can work with other standards and functionality.
If you have specific information regarding your TC's
work or if you have specific information that addresses one of
the questions in particular that
you want to have included in the response please send to us in the next couple
of days.
Thanks!
Kathryn
Kathryn Breininger From: Frans van Bommel [mailto:f.van.bommel@vektis.nl] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:23 AM To: Yun Sik Kwak; Sylvia Webb; Robert Stegwee; Robert Leif; Rachel Foerster; Pim van der Eijk; Pete Wenzel; Paul Knapp; Monica Martin; Mike Doran; Melvin Reynolds; Masaharu Obayashi; Ken Toyoda; Jill Kaufman; Jacques R. Durand; Edgar Gluck; Ed Hammond; David RR Webber (XML); Dale Moberg; Audrey E. Dickerson; Asuman Dogac; Andreas Schultz; Anders Grangard; Breininger, Kathryn R Subject: ISO TC215 e-Business study; minutes San Diego; Questionaire Dear all,
Attached you will find the minutes (summary) of the ISO TC215 ebXML
orientation meeting hosted by HL7 in San Diego.
Sorry for sending it later as promished during the meeting. At the end of
the document references are made to more information about the MoU, ebXML, OASIS
and HL7.
The next step will be the preparation of the advice for TC meeting in
Montreal (29 March 2007). We have prepared a few questions in order to get a
better view upon a possible role of TC215 in the e-Business process. Based upon
the already available results of the study and the answers of all the experts
Dr.Kwak and Mr van Bommel will introduce a proposal for the
future relationship between TC215 and ebXML.
Questions:
1. Which sector and/or group do you represent?
(Healthcare, Business, ICT, Standardisation, ........)
2. What do you think can be the benefit of using ebXML
for TC215 and or HL7?
3. Which parts of ebXML are of most interest for
TC215
4. Which areas of the healthcare domain can use ebXML as
it is (Patient records, reimbursement, .........)
5. Is there a need for TC215 to support the ebXML
development process in common (not only Healthcare)?
6. Organisational viewpoint: How can we work together in
the future with ISO, OASIS, UN/cefact and others for e-Business (New liasons,
participation in other groups, a new WG or task Force within TC215,
......)?
7. If a new TC215 WG is proposed, what should be the
main target of this group.
Note that for this purpose we don't need to much technical details but
we prefer only short opinions (if needed with references to other
documents with more information).
Your assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Please take a short time to fill in the questions of this email and
return them to me before 1 March 2007.
Best regards
Frans van Bommel
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]