[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ebXML 'Acknowledgement' vs 'Acknowledgment'
Hi, I'd like to bring to your attention an anomaly between the ebMS/ebBPSS specifications and the ebXML-bp XSD regarding the spelling of 'Acknowledgement'. The discreppancy has come to our attenton during an ebXML implementation with a trading partner, in particular between spelling of the following message types: 'ReceiptAcknowledgement' versus 'ReceiptAcknowledgment' 'AcceptanceAcknowledgement' versus 'ReceiptAcknowledgment' The ebBPSS and ebMS specifications contain references to both spellings throughout, which I believe is the source of the anomaly. This includes general mention as well as embedded XML examples. However, the XSD only contains the spelling 'Acknowledgement' (ie with the 'e'). I would like to obtain your ruling on which spelling is correct. My opinion is that the XSD is the governing document and hence the spelling with the 'e' is correct. I would also suggest that future versions of the ebMS and ebBPSS specifications are updated for consistency. Reference docs: http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebMS.pdf http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebxml-bp/2.0.4/OS/schema/ebbp-2.0.4.xsd Thanks Andy Mulholland Andrew Mulholland Solutions Architect Mincom Axis ? andrew.mulholland@mincom.com É Tel +61 (0)7 3303 3668 Ê Fax +61 (0)7 3303 3712 È Cell +61 (0)414 602174 Mincom. The People. The Experience. The Vision. This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete it and notify the sender. The contents of this e-mail are the opinion of the writer only and are not endorsed by the Mincom Group of companies unless expressly stated otherwise.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]