ebxml-msg message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: T2 Minor Inconsistency in Section 12.2
- From: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>
- To: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 18:33:21 -0700
Marty:
I am referring to the following sub-section from the Messaging
Service spec:
12.2 Collaboration Protocol Agreement
The configuration of Security for MSHs may be specified in the
CPA. Three
areas of the CPA have security definitions as follows:
·
The Document Exchange section addresses
security to be applied to the payload of the message. The MSH is not responsible
for any security specified at this level but may offer these services to the
message sender.
·
The Message section addresses security
applied to the entire ebXML Document, which includes the header and the
payload.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: T2 Minor Inconsistency in Section
12.2
Arvola,
Unfortunately there are three different "versions" of
version 1.0 in
circulation: The copy approved on May 10, the slightly
reformatted copy,
and the more recent reformatted copy. Apparently the
line numbering does
not agree among them.
Please re-post this comment,
referring to the section number.
Everyone, if you refer to line numbers,
please be sure you are looking at
the original approved version(labelled
"normative document" on the ebXML
web site). It would be safest always to
include section numbers in
your
comments.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin
W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY
10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:
Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @
us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
Arvola
Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 07/26/2001
07:14:26 PM
To: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
Subject: T2 Minor Inconsistency in Section
12.2
Line 1978 talks about three areas of the CPA that
have security
definitions. This is followed by only two bullets.
The
first bullet says "The MSH is not responsible for any
security
specified at this level but may offer these services to the
message
sender". This seems contradictory. If the MSH offers these
services, isn't
it responsible for doing the necessary encryption and
decryption? What
does "not responsible for any security specified at this
level" really
mean?
The second bullet refers to a Message
section in the CPA. No such section
can be found in the schema
(Appendix D in the CPPA
spec).
-Arvola
------------------------------------------------------------------
To
unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe"
in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC